Human Genomics (Feb 2023)

Predictors of the utility of clinical exome sequencing as a first-tier genetic test in patients with Mendelian phenotypes: results from a referral center study on 603 consecutive cases

  • Tom Alix,
  • Céline Chéry,
  • Thomas Josse,
  • Jean-Pierre Bronowicki,
  • François Feillet,
  • Rosa-Maria Guéant-Rodriguez,
  • Farès Namour,
  • Jean-Louis Guéant,
  • Abderrahim Oussalah

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s40246-023-00455-x
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 17, no. 1
pp. 1 – 15

Abstract

Read online

Abstract Background Clinical exome sequencing (CES) provides a comprehensive and effective analysis of relevant disease-associated genes in a cost-effective manner compared to whole exome sequencing. Although several studies have focused on the diagnostic yield of CES, no study has assessed predictors of CES utility among patients with various Mendelian phenotypes. We assessed the effectiveness of CES as a first-level genetic test for molecular diagnosis in patients with a Mendelian phenotype and explored independent predictors of the clinical utility of CES. Results Between January 2016 and December 2019, 603 patients (426 probands and 177 siblings) underwent CES at the Department of Molecular Medicine of the University Hospital of Nancy. The median age of the probands was 34 years (IQR, 12–48), and the proportion of males was 46.9% (200/426). Adults and children represented 64.8% (276/426) and 35.2% (150/426), respectively. The median test-to-report time was 5.6 months (IQR, 4.1–7.2). CES revealed 203 pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants in 160 patients, corresponding to a diagnostic yield of 37.6% (160/426). Independent predictors of CES utility were criteria strongly suggestive of an extreme phenotype, including pediatric presentation and patient phenotypes associated with an increased risk of a priori probability of a monogenic disorder, the inclusion of at least one family member in addition to the proband, and a CES prescription performed by an expert in the field of rare genetic disorders. Conclusions Based on a large dataset of consecutive patients with various Mendelian phenotypes referred for CES as a first-tier genetic test, we report a diagnostic yield of ~ 40% and several independent predictors of CES utility that might improve CES diagnostic efficiency.

Keywords