Cancers (Nov 2022)

Immunological and Genomic Analysis Reveals Clinically Relevant Distinctions between Angiosarcoma Subgroups

  • Stefan G. van Ravensteijn,
  • Yvonne M. H. Versleijen-Jonkers,
  • Melissa H. S. Hillebrandt-Roeffen,
  • Marije E. Weidema,
  • Maikel J. L. Nederkoorn,
  • Kalijn F. Bol,
  • Mark A. J. Gorris,
  • Kiek Verrijp,
  • Leonie I. Kroeze,
  • Tessa J. J. de Bitter,
  • Richarda M. de Voer,
  • Uta E. Flucke,
  • Ingrid M. E. Desar

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers14235938
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 14, no. 23
p. 5938

Abstract

Read online

Angiosarcomas (AS) are extremely rare and aggressive vascular malignancies subdivided in de novo primary AS (pAS) and secondary AS (sAS). We hypothesize that the combination of immunological and genomic profiles significantly differs between primary and secondary AS, with potential impact on treatment strategies and a role for immunotherapy. Tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes were analyzed using multiplex immunohistochemistry from 79 pAS and 178 sAS. Median cell density was significantly higher in sAS for CD3+ T-cells (p + cytotoxic T-cells (p = 0.033), CD4+ T-helper cells (p + T-regulatory cells (p + B-cell density was comparable (p = 0.417). Comprehensive genomic profiling was performed in 25 pAS and 25 sAS. A (likely) pathogenic mutation was detected in 80% of pAS vs. 88% of sAS (p = 0.702). Amplifications were found in 15% of pAS vs. 84% of sAS (p p = 0.021) and MYC amplifications (p < 0.001) were predominantly seen in sAS. In conclusion we observed a clear and clinical relevant distinction in immune infiltration and genomic profiles between pAS and sAS. The T-cell infiltrated tumor microenvironment and frequent DDR gene mutations, especially in sAS, warrant clinical trials with immunotherapy.

Keywords