Frontiers in Endocrinology (Oct 2021)

Association of Estrogen Receptor Genes Polymorphisms With Polycystic Ovary Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Based on Observational Studies

  • Siyu Zhou,
  • Siyu Zhou,
  • Siyu Zhou,
  • Shu Wen,
  • Shu Wen,
  • Shu Wen,
  • Yongcheng Sheng,
  • Meina Yang,
  • Meina Yang,
  • Meina Yang,
  • Xiaoyang Shen,
  • Xiaoyang Shen,
  • Xiaoyang Shen,
  • Yan Chen,
  • Yan Chen,
  • Yan Chen,
  • Deying Kang,
  • Deying Kang,
  • Liangzhi Xu,
  • Liangzhi Xu,
  • Liangzhi Xu

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2021.726184
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 12

Abstract

Read online

PurposeControversial results existed in amounts of studies investigating the authentic association of estrogen receptor genes (ESR1 and ESR2) polymorphisms with the occurrence and progression of polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS). The inconsistency might result from different loci, sample sizes, and ethnicities. To find the potential correlations between ESR1/ESR2 polymorphisms and PCOS risk, we conducted the first systematic review and meta-analysis to comprehensively summarize current studies in a large combined population.MethodsEligible studies were retrieved from PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, CBM, CNKI, WANFANG, and VIP up to February 28, 2021. The quality of studies was assessed using the Newcastle–Ottawa Scale (NOS) scoring system. Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (95%CIs) were calculated to synthesize data in five genetic models. Subgroup analyses were conducted by ethnicity. Heterogeneity and publication bias were also assessed. The protocol was registered in PROSPERO under the number CRD42021239200.ResultsA total of 8 studies involving 1,522 PCOS patients and 4,198 controls were included. No evidence demonstrated the association of ESR1 rs2234693 (OR=1.07 95%CI 0.98–1.18), ESR1 rs9340799 (OR=0.99 95%CI 0.69–1.43), or ESR2 rs4986938 (OR=1.06 95%CI 0.81–1.38) polymorphisms and PCOS risk in five genetic models. According to stratified subgroup analyses, ethnicity was considered the major source of heterogeneity. No publication bias was found in eligible studies.ConclusionThe present meta-analysis found no significant associations between the variants of ESR1 rs2234693, ESR1 rs9340799, ESR2 rs4936938, and individual PCOS susceptibility, even if ethnicity was taken into account.Systematic Review RegistrationThe protocol was registered in PROSPERO (available from https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO) with the ID number CRD42021239200.

Keywords