PLoS ONE (Jan 2016)

Evaluation of the Effects of Pasireotide LAR Administration on Lymphocele Prevention after Axillary Node Dissection for Breast Cancer: Results of a Randomized Non-Comparative Phase 2 Study.

  • Elisabeth Chéreau,
  • Catherine Uzan,
  • Emmanuelle Boutmy-Deslandes,
  • Sarah Zohar,
  • Corinne Bézu,
  • Chafika Mazouni,
  • Jean-Rémi Garbay,
  • Emile Daraï,
  • Roman Rouzier

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0156096
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 11, no. 6
p. e0156096

Abstract

Read online

OBJECTIVE:The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy (response rate centered on 80%) of a somatostatin analog with high affinity for 4 somatostatin receptors in reducing the postoperative incidence of symptomatic lymphocele formation following total mastectomy with axillary lymph node dissection. SETTING:This prospective, double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 2 trial was conducted in two secondary care centres. PARTICIPANTS:All female patients for whom mastectomy and axillary lymph node dissection were indicated were eligible for the study, including patients who had received neo-adjuvant chemotherapy. Main exclusion criteria were related to diabetes, cardiac insufficiency, disorder of cardiac conduction or hepatic failure. INTERVENTIONS:Patients were randomised to receive one injection of either prolonged-release pasireotide 60 mg or placebo (physiological serum), which were administered intramuscularly 7 to 10 days before the scheduled surgery. The study was conducted in a double-blind manner. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES:The primary outcome measure was the percentage of patients who did not develop post-operative axillary symptomatic lymphoceles during the 2 postoperative months. Secondary endpoints were the total quantity of lymph drained, duration and daily volume of drainage and aspirated volumes of lymph. RESULTS:Ninety-one patients were randomised. Ninety patients were evaluable: 42 patients received pasireotide, and 48 patients received placebo. The mean estimated response rate were 62.4% (95% Credibility Interval [CrI]: 48.6%-75.3%) in the treatment group and 50.2% (95% CrI: 37.6%-62.8%) in the placebo group. Overall safety was comparable across groups, and one serious adverse event occurred. In the treatment group, one patient with known insulin-depe*ndent diabetes required hospitalization for hyperglycaemia. CONCLUSIONS:With this phase 2 preliminary study, even if our results indicate a trend towards a reduction in symptomatic lymphocele, pre-operative injection of pasireotide failed to achieve a response rate centered on 80%. Pharmacokinetics analysis suggests that effect of pasireotide could be optimised. TRIAL REGISTRATION:ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01356862.