Data set on the bioprecipitation of sulfate and trivalent arsenic by acidophilic non-traditional sulfur reducing bacteria
Letícia Paiva de Matos,
Patrícia Freitas Costa,
Mariana Moreira,
Paula Cristine Silva Gomes,
Silvana de Queiroz Silva,
Leandro Vinícius Alves Gurgel,
Mônica Cristina Teixeira
Affiliations
Letícia Paiva de Matos
Federal University of Ouro Preto, Campus Universitário Morro do Cruzeiro, s/n°, Bauxita, 35400-000 Ouro Preto, Minas Gerais, Brazil
Patrícia Freitas Costa
Federal University of Ouro Preto, Campus Universitário Morro do Cruzeiro, s/n°, Bauxita, 35400-000 Ouro Preto, Minas Gerais, Brazil
Mariana Moreira
Federal University of Ouro Preto, Campus Universitário Morro do Cruzeiro, s/n°, Bauxita, 35400-000 Ouro Preto, Minas Gerais, Brazil
Paula Cristine Silva Gomes
Federal University of Ouro Preto, Campus Universitário Morro do Cruzeiro, s/n°, Bauxita, 35400-000 Ouro Preto, Minas Gerais, Brazil
Silvana de Queiroz Silva
Federal University of Ouro Preto, Campus Universitário Morro do Cruzeiro, s/n°, Bauxita, 35400-000 Ouro Preto, Minas Gerais, Brazil
Leandro Vinícius Alves Gurgel
Federal University of Ouro Preto, Campus Universitário Morro do Cruzeiro, s/n°, Bauxita, 35400-000 Ouro Preto, Minas Gerais, Brazil
Mônica Cristina Teixeira
Corresponding author. Fax: +55 31 3559 1069.; Federal University of Ouro Preto, Campus Universitário Morro do Cruzeiro, s/n°, Bauxita, 35400-000 Ouro Preto, Minas Gerais, Brazil
Data presented here are related to the original paper “Simultaneous removal of sulfate and arsenic using immobilized non-traditional sulfate reducing bacteria (SRB) mixed culture and alternative low-cost carbon sources” published by same authors (Matos et al., 2018) [1]. The data set here presented aims to facilitate this paper comprehension by giving readers some additional information. Data set includes a brief description of experimental conditions and the results obtained during both batch and semi-continuous reactors experiments. Data confirmed arsenic and sulfate were simultaneously removed under acidic pH by using a biological treatment based on the activity of a non-traditional sulfur reducing bacteria consortium. This microbial consortium was able to utilize glycerol, powdered chicken feathers as carbon donors, and proved to be resistant to arsenite up to 8.0 mg L−1. Data related to sulfate and arsenic removal efficiencies, residual arsenite and sulfate contents, pH and Eh measurements obtained under different experimental conditions were depicted in graphical format.Refers to https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2017.11.035 Keywords: Arsenite, Sulfate reduction, Bioremediation, Immobilized cells, Acid pH
