Allergology International (Jan 2015)

Validation of a COPD screening questionnaire and establishment of diagnostic cut-points in a Japanese general population: The Hisayama study

  • Go Tsukuya,
  • Koichiro Matsumoto,
  • Satoru Fukuyama,
  • Bruce Crawford,
  • Yoichi Nakanishi,
  • Masakazu Ichinose,
  • Kentaro Machida,
  • Takuya Samukawa,
  • Toshiharu Ninomiya,
  • Yutaka Kiyohara,
  • Hiromasa Inoue

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.alit.2014.06.002
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 64, no. 1
pp. 49 – 53

Abstract

Read online

Background: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is highly prevalent worldwide. COPD is a treatable disease and it is important to identify COPD subjects, highlighting the need for an efficient screening measure. Although the COPD screening questionnaire (COPD Population Screener, COPD-PS) was developed as a screening tool, its validity is not clear in population-based studies. This study determines the validity of the COPD-PS in the general Japanese population. Methods: All registered residents living in the town of Hisayama aged above 40 were solicited to participate in a health check-up in 2012. All subjects aged 40–79 without physician-diagnosed asthma or lung resection were recruited, and 2357 subjects with the COPD-PS recorded and valid spirometry measurements were analyzed. Persistent airflow obstruction (AO) was defined by post-bronchodilator FEV1/FVC < 0.7. The sensitivity and specificity of the COPD-PS score for identifying AO was assessed by logistic regression analysis. Results: The prevalence of AO in this population was 6.5%. The overall area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve for the continuous COPD-PS score was 0.748. A cut-point of 4-points is recommended, resulting in a sensitivity of 67.1% and specificity of 72.9% with an area under the ROC curve of 0.70. The positive predictive value was 14.6% and negative predictive value was 97.0%. Conclusions: The COPD-PS appears to be an adequate measure for large scale screening of possible airflow obstruction requiring further testing with spirometry.

Keywords