Frontiers in Pharmacology (Apr 2019)

Tenofovir-Diphosphate as a Marker of HIV Pre-exposure Prophylaxis Use Among East African Men and Women

  • Maria Pyra,
  • Maria Pyra,
  • Pete Anderson,
  • Jessica E. Haberer,
  • Jessica E. Haberer,
  • Renee Heffron,
  • Renee Heffron,
  • Connie Celum,
  • Connie Celum,
  • Connie Celum,
  • Stephen Asiimwe,
  • Elly Katabira,
  • Nelly R. Mugo,
  • Nelly R. Mugo,
  • Elizabeth A. Bukusi,
  • Elizabeth A. Bukusi,
  • Elizabeth A. Bukusi,
  • Jared M. Baeten,
  • Jared M. Baeten,
  • Jared M. Baeten

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2019.00401
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 10

Abstract

Read online

Background: Controlled pharmacokinetic (PK) studies in United States populations have defined categories of tenofovir-diphosphate (TFV-DP) in dried blood spots (DBS) for various pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) adherence targets. It is unknown how these categories perform in other populations. Therefore, we evaluated the sensitivity and specificity of these PK-derived categories compared to daily medication electronic adherence monitoring (MEMS) data among East African men and women using daily PrEP.Methods: Participants were enrolled as members of HIV serodiscordant couples as part of an open-label PrEP study in Kenya and Uganda. Blood samples were taken at quarterly visits and stored as DBS, which were analyzed for TFV-DP concentrations.Results: Among 150 samples from 103 participants, MEMs data indicated that 87 (58%) took ≥4 doses and 62 (41%) took ≥6 per week consistently over the 4 weeks prior to sample collection. Sensitivities of DBS TFV-DP levels were 62% for the ≥4 doses/week category (≥700 fmol/punch TFV-DP) and 44% for the ≥6 doses/week category (≥1050 fmol/punch TFV-DP); specificities were 86 and 94%, respectively. There were no statistically significant differences in these sensitivities and specificities by gender.Conclusion: In this sample of East African PrEP users, categories of TFV-DP concentrations developed from directly observed PrEP use among United States populations had high specificity but lower than expected sensitivity. Sensitivity was lowest when MEMS data indicated high adherence (i.e., ≥6 doses/week). PrEP studies and implementation programs should carefully consider the sensitivity and specificity of the TFV-DP levels used for adherence feedback.

Keywords