Stroke: Vascular and Interventional Neurology (Jul 2023)

Manual and Oscillometric Blood Pressure in tPA‐Treated Acute Ischemic Stroke: What Constitutes Agreement?

  • Mary A. Grove,
  • Mani Paliwal,
  • Anne Shearin,
  • Jane Kaiser,
  • Eun Sun Koo,
  • Danielle Howey,
  • Michele Galati,
  • Bozena Czekalski,
  • Jennifer Dumawal,
  • Briana DeCarvalho,
  • Jackie Dwyer,
  • Georgios Tsivgoulis,
  • Andrei V. Alexandrov,
  • Anne W. Alexandrov

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/SVIN.122.000711
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 3, no. 4

Abstract

Read online

Background Automatic noninvasive oscillometric blood pressure (NIBP) devices measure mean arterial pressure (MAP); systolic and diastolic blood pressure (SBP, DBP) are algorithmically derived from MAP. The most invalid NIBP measure is SBP, yet stroke practitioners use it to manage blood pressure (BP) in accordance with thrombolysis guidelines. We determined agreement between SBP, DBP, and MAP measured manually and by NIBP in patients treated with alteplase. Methods A multisite prospective observational study of NIBP and manual BP agreement was conducted in patients treated with alteplase immediately after bolus and infusion initiation using methods established in guidelines for the assessment of device agreement. Dual auscultatory stethoscopes were used by 2 investigators to ensure agreement with each manual BP variable and MAP was calculated using the standard formula for manual BP measures. Data were analyzed using Bland–Altman analyses and Lin concordance correlation coefficient. Results A total of 7 hospitals participated, collecting 5 sets of manual/NIBP BPs in 95 patients treated with alteplase (475 paired measures). Range in limits of agreement were SBP: −28.91 to 21.41 mmHg with Lin's concordance correlation coefficient 0.8; DBP: −21.0 to 19.0 mmHg with Lin's concordance correlation coefficient 0.69; and MAP: −27.5 to 16.5 mmHg with Lin's concordance correlation coefficient 0.7. There was no difference in device agreement by BP device manufacturer brand. Differences in SBP, DBP, and MAP between NIBP and manual sphygmomanometry failed to reach guideline recommendations requiring 80% of measures to fall within a 5 mmHg difference and 95% of measures to fall within a 10 mmHg difference. Conclusion NIBP devices produce significantly different BP measures then manual sphygmomanometry auscultated BP. Because NIBP devices rely on the MAP and do not directly measure SBP and DBP, definition of what constitutes safe MAP boundaries in patients treated with alteplase should be determined when automatic BP measurement is used in clinical practice.

Keywords