BMC Primary Care (Sep 2024)

Supporting alcohol brief interventions and pharmacotherapy provision in Australian First Nations primary care: exploratory analysis of a cluster randomised trial

  • Monika Dzidowska,
  • KS Kylie Lee,
  • James H. Conigrave,
  • Scott Wilson,
  • Noel Hayman,
  • Rowena Ivers,
  • Julia Vnuk,
  • Paul Haber,
  • Katherine M. Conigrave

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12875-024-02598-9
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 25, no. 1
pp. 1 – 14

Abstract

Read online

Abstract Introduction Primary care provides an important opportunity to detect unhealthy alcohol use and offer assistance but many barriers to this exist. In an Australian context, Aboriginal Community Controlled Health Services (ACCHS) are community-led and run health services, which provide holistic primary care to Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples. A recent cluster randomised trial conducted with ACCHS provided a service support model which showed a small but significant difference in provision of ‘any treatment’ for unhealthy alcohol use. However, it was not clear which treatment modalities were increased. Aims To test the effect of an ACCHS support model for alcohol on: (i) delivery of verbal alcohol intervention (alcohol advice or counselling); (ii) prescription of relapse prevention pharmacotherapies. Methods Intervention: 24-month, multi-faceted service support model. Design: cluster randomised trial; equal allocation to early-support (‘treatment’) and waitlist control arms. Participants: 22 ACCHS. Analysis: Multilevel logistic regression to compare odds of a client receiving treatment in any two-month period as routinely recorded on practice software. Results Support was associated with a significant increase in the odds of verbal alcohol intervention being recorded (OR = 7.60, [95% CI = 5.54, 10.42], p < 0.001) from a low baseline. The odds of pharmacotherapies being prescribed (OR = 1.61, [95% CI = 0.92, 2.80], p = 0.1) did not increase significantly. There was high heterogeneity in service outcomes. Conclusions While a statistically significant increase in verbal alcohol intervention rates was achieved, this was not clinically significant because of the low baseline. Our data likely underestimates rates of treatment provision due to barriers documenting verbal interventions in practice software, and because different software may be used by drug and alcohol teams. The support made little impact on pharmacotherapy prescription. Changes at multiple organisational levels, including within clinical guidelines for primary care, may be needed to meaningfully improve provision of alcohol treatment in ACCHS. Trial registration ACTRN12618001892202 (retrospectively registered on 21/11/2018).

Keywords