Skeletal Muscle (Oct 2024)

Spiny mice are primed but fail to regenerate volumetric skeletal muscle loss injuries

  • Mackenzie L. Davenport,
  • Amaya Fong,
  • Kaela N. Albury,
  • C. Spencer Henley-Beasley,
  • Elisabeth R. Barton,
  • Malcolm Maden,
  • Maurice S. Swanson

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13395-024-00358-y
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 14, no. 1
pp. 1 – 13

Abstract

Read online

Abstract Background In recent years, the African spiny mouse Acomys cahirinus has been shown to regenerate a remarkable array of severe internal and external injuries in the absence of a fibrotic response, including the ability to regenerate full-thickness skin excisions, ear punches, severe kidney injuries, and complete transection of the spinal cord. While skeletal muscle is highly regenerative in adult mammals, Acomys displays superior muscle regeneration properties compared with standard laboratory mice following several injuries, including serial cardiotoxin injections of skeletal muscle and volumetric muscle loss (VML) of the panniculus carnosus muscle following full-thickness excision injuries. VML is an extreme muscle injury defined as the irrecoverable ablation of muscle mass, most commonly resulting from combat injuries or surgical debridement. Barriers to the treatment of VML injury include early and prolonged inflammatory responses that promote fibrotic repair and the loss of structural and mechanical cues that promote muscle regeneration. While the regeneration of the panniculus carnosus in Acomys is impressive, its direct relevance to the study of VML in patients is less clear as this muscle has largely been lost in humans, and, while striated, is not a true skeletal muscle. We therefore sought to test the ability of Acomys to regenerate a skeletal muscle more commonly used in VML injury models. Methods We performed two different VML injuries of the Acomys tibialis anterior muscle and compared the regenerative response to a standard laboratory mouse strain, Mus C57BL6/J. Results Neither Acomys nor Mus recovered lost muscle mass or myofiber number within three months following VML injury, and Acomys also failed to recover force production better than Mus. In contrast, Acomys continued to express eMHC within the injured area even three months following injury, whereas Mus ceased expressing eMHC less than one-month post-injury, suggesting that Acomys muscle was primed, but failed, to regenerate. Conclusions While the panniculus carnosus muscle in Acomys regenerates following VML injury in the context of full-thickness skin excision, this regenerative ability does not translate to regenerative repair of a skeletal muscle.

Keywords