Indian Pacing and Electrophysiology Journal (Nov 2024)

Urinary NT-proBNP compared head-to-head to plasmatic NT-proBNP in a real life collective with an ICD

  • Benedikt Seither,
  • Alexander Schober,
  • Raphael Allgaier,
  • Christine Meindl,
  • Michael Paulus,
  • Ute Hubauer,
  • Andreas Schober,
  • Ekrem Ücer,
  • Sabine Fredersdorf,
  • Petra Lehn,
  • Andreas Keyser,
  • Andreas Luchner,
  • Lars Maier,
  • Stefan Wallner,
  • Carsten Jungbauer

Journal volume & issue
Vol. 24, no. 6
pp. 315 – 320

Abstract

Read online

Aims: Plasma NT-proBNP is an established marker of heart failure. Previous studies suggested urinary NT-proBNP has potential as marker of chronic heart failure as well. The objective of this study was to compare urinary NT-proBNP to plasma NT-proBNP in a real-life collective of patients with an ICD, especially regarding ICD-therapies. Methods & results: NT-proBNP was assessed in plasma and fresh spot urine (the latter related to urinary creatinine) from 322 patients of our ICD outpatient clinic. 54 healthy individuals served as a control group. Follow-up regarding mortality and ICD therapies was performed after 32 months (IQR 5–35 months). Plasma and urinary NT-proBNP was positively correlated (r = 0.89, p Youden-Index showed significantly higher event rates for appropriate ICD-shock therapies (p < 0.001 and p = 0.016) and the combined endpoint of all-cause-mortality and shock therapies (each p < 0.001). Urinary and plasma NT-proBNP were independent predictors for appropriate ICD-shock-therapies and for the combined endpoint of all-cause mortality and appropriate ICD-shock-therapies (each p < 0.001). Conclusion: Urinary NT-proBNP as a marker for LV dysfunction and symptomatic heart failure showed promising predictive values. Associations between plasma as well as urinary NT-proBNP and ICD shock-therapies could be shown.