Effectiveness of Lurasidone 80 mg in Patients with Schizophrenia: Results of an Open-Label, 12-Week Extension Study

Abstract

Itaru Miura,1 Kei Watabe,2 Reiko Sakaguchi,3 Keisuke Okamoto,4 Hidenori Maruyama5 1Department of Neuropsychiatry, Fukushima Medical University, Fukushima, Japan; 2Department of Data Science, Drug Development Division, Sumitomo Pharma Co., Ltd, Tokyo, Japan; 3Department of Clinical Research, Drug Development Division, Sumitomo Pharma Co., Ltd, Tokyo, Japan; 4Department of Clinical Operation, Drug Development Division, Sumitomo Pharma Co., Ltd, Tokyo, Japan; 5Medical Affairs, Sumitomo Pharma Co., Ltd, Tokyo, JapanCorrespondence: Itaru Miura, Department of Neuropsychiatry, Fukushima Medical University 1 Hikarigaoka, Fukushima, 960-1295, Japan, Tel [phone], Fax [phone], Email [email protected]: To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of lurasidone 80 mg/day (versus the 40 mg/day dose) during a 12-week, open-label extension study in patients with an acute exacerbation of schizophrenia who had completed a 6-week double-blind study of lurasidone.Patients and Methods: A total of 289 adult patients with schizophrenia completed the double-blind study and enrolled in the 12-week extension study. Lurasidone was flexibly dosed at 40 or 80 mg/day. Effectiveness measures included the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) subscale scores, Clinical Global Impression-Severity Scale (CGI-S), and Calgary Depression Scale for Schizophrenia (CDSS), analyzed based on last observation carried forward (LOCF-endpoint). Safety/tolerability assessments included adverse events, body weight, laboratory tests, and discontinuation due to adverse events.Results: Mean endpoint change was greater for lurasidone in modal doses of 80 mg/d (N=136) vs 40 mg/d (N=153) on the PANSS positive subscale (− 3.0 vs − 2.3), PANSS negative subscale (− 1.9 vs − 1.7), PANSS General Psychopathology subscale (− 5.1 vs − 3.8), the CGI-S score (− 0.5 vs − 0.4), and the CDSS score (− 0.7 vs − 0.1). Discontinuation rates due to adverse events on lurasidone modal 80 mg/d vs 40 mg/d were 4.4% vs 7.2%; and the most common adverse events in the modal 80 mg/d group were nasopharyngitis, 7.4% (vs 4.6% on modal 40 mg/d), constipation, 5.9% (vs 2.0%), and headache, 5.9% (vs 2.0%).Conclusion: In patients with acute schizophrenia treated with lurasidone 40 mg/d, increasing the dose to 80 mg/d was well tolerated, and was associated with greater improvement in PANSS subscale scores compared to continued treatment with a dose of 40 mg/d.Keywords: lurasidone, schizophrenia, extension treatment, dose escalation, effectiveness, safety

Keywords

• lurasidone
• schizophrenia
• extension treatment
• dose escalation
• effectiveness
• safety