Biomedical Journal (Oct 2014)

Levofloxacin-containing second-line anti-Helicobacter pylori eradication in Taiwanese real-world practice

  • Chih-Ming Liang,
  • Jen-Wen Cheng,
  • Chung-Mou Kuo,
  • Kuo-Chin Chang,
  • Keng-Liang Wu,
  • Wei-Chen Tai,
  • King-Wah Chiu,
  • Shue-Shian Chiou,
  • Ming-Tsung Lin,
  • Tsung-Hui Hu,
  • Seng-Kee Chuah

DOI
https://doi.org/10.4103/2319-4170.125650
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 37, no. 5
pp. 326 – 330

Abstract

Read online

Background: Quinolone-containing triple therapy is recommended as an option for non-bismuth containing second-line Helicobacter pylori eradication. Current available Taiwanese reports in the literature used 7-day quinolone-containing triple therapy. As a result, some physicians still prescribe 7-day regimens in real-world practice in Taiwan. This study aimed to further assess the appropriateness of 7-day levofloxacin-containing triple therapy as second-line therapy. Methods: We enrolled 61 patients who failed H. pylori eradication using the standard triple therapy for 7 days and were prescribed levofloxacin-containing second-line triple therapy (levofloxacin 500 mg once daily, amoxicillin 1 g twice daily, and esomeprazole 40 mg twice daily). Routine follow-up with either endoscopy or urea breath test was done 8 weeks later to assess treatment response. Results: The eradication rates were 78.7% in the intention-to-treat analysis and 81% in the per-protocol analysis. The incidence of adverse events was 6.6%. Drug compliance was 95.1%. Antibiotic resistance showed the following results: Amoxicillin (0%), levofloxacin (23.5%), clarythromycin (35.3%), metronidazole (17.6%), and tetracycline (0%). Conclusion: The 7-day levofloxacin-containing triple therapy provides an unacceptable per-protocol report card as the second-line treatment for anti-H. pylori eradication in Taiwan and should be modified by either extending the duration to 10-14 days or seeking other regimens.

Keywords