PLoS ONE (Jan 2015)

Stop Saying That It Is Wrong! Psychophysiological, Cognitive, and Metacognitive Markers of Children's Sensitivity to Punishment.

  • Maria Luz Gonzalez-Gadea,
  • Anouk Scheres,
  • Carlos Andres Tobon,
  • Juliane Damm,
  • Sandra Baez,
  • David Huepe,
  • Julian Marino,
  • Sandra Marder,
  • Facundo Manes,
  • Sofia Abrevaya,
  • Agustin Ibanez

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0133683
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 10, no. 7
p. e0133683

Abstract

Read online

Neurodevelopmental evidence suggests that children's main decision-making strategy is to avoid options likely to induce punishment. However, the cognitive and affective factors contributing to children's avoidance to high punishment frequency remain unknown. The present study explored psychophysiological, cognitive, and metacognitive processes associated with sensitivity to punishment frequency. We evaluated 54 participants (between 8 and 15 years old) with a modified Iowa Gambling Task for children (IGT-C) which included options with varying long-term profit and punishment frequencies. Skin conductance responses (SCRs) were recorded during this task. Additionally, we assessed IGT-C metacognitive knowledge, fluid intelligence, and executive functions. Participants exhibited behavioral avoidance and high anticipatory SCRs to options with high frequency of punishment. Moreover, age, IGT-C metacognitive knowledge, and inhibitory control were associated with individual differences in sensitivity to punishment frequency. Our results suggest that children's preference for infrequently punished decisions is partially explained by psychophysiological signals as well as task complexity and development of cognitive control.