BMC Anesthesiology (May 2024)

A prospective, randomized, single-blinded study comparing the efficacy and safety of dexmedetomidine and propofol for sedation during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography

  • Wenyou Zhang,
  • Liangrong Wang,
  • Na Zhu,
  • Wenzhi Wu,
  • Haiyan Liu

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12871-024-02572-z
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 24, no. 1
pp. 1 – 10

Abstract

Read online

Abstract Background Balanced propofol sedation is extensively used in endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP), but sedation-related adverse events (SRAEs) are common. In various clinical settings, the combination of dexmedetomidine with opioids and benzodiazepines has provided effective sedation with increased safety. The aim of this investigation was to compare the efficacy and safety of dexmedetomidine and propofol for sedation during ERCP. Methods Forty-one patients were randomly divided into two groups: the dexmedetomidine (DEX) group and the propofol (PRO) group. Patients in the DEX group received an additional bolus of 0.6 μg kg−1 dexmedetomidine followed by a dexmedetomidine infusion at 1.2 μg kg−1 h−1, whereas the PRO group received 1–2 mg kg−1 of propofol bolus followed by a propofol infusion at 2–3 mg kg−1 h−1. During ERCP, the primary outcome was the incidence of hypoxemia (SpO2 10 s). Other intraoperative adverse events were also recorded as secondary outcomes, including respiratory depression (respiratory rate of < 10 bpm min−1), hypotension (MAP < 65 mmHg), and bradycardia (HR < 45 beats min−1). Results The incidence of hypoxemia was significantly reduced in the DEX group compared to the PRO group (0% versus 28.6%, respectively; P = 0.032). Patients in the PRO group exhibited respiratory depression more frequently than patients in the DEX group (35% versus 81%, respectively; P = 0.003). There were no significant differences in terms of hypotension and bradycardia episodes between groups. During the procedures, the satisfaction scores of endoscopists and patients, as well as the pain and procedure memory scores of patients were comparable between groups. Conclusion In comparison with propofol, dexmedetomidine provided adequate sedation safety with no adverse effects on sedation efficacy during ERCP. Trial registration Chinese Clinical Trial Registry, ChiCTR2200061468, 25/06/2022.

Keywords