Medicina (Feb 2024)

Utilization of Augmented Reality Head-Mounted Display for the Surgical Management of Thoracolumbar Spinal Trauma

  • Michael Ryan Kann,
  • Miguel A. Ruiz-Cardozo,
  • Samuel Brehm,
  • Tim Bui,
  • Karan Joseph,
  • Karma Barot,
  • Gabriel Trevino,
  • Abigail Carey-Ewend,
  • Som P. Singh,
  • Matthew De La Paz,
  • Ahmed Hanafy,
  • Michael Olufawo,
  • Rujvee P. Patel,
  • Alexander T. Yahanda,
  • Alexander Perdomo-Pantoja,
  • Julio J. Jauregui,
  • Magalie Cadieux,
  • Brenton Pennicooke,
  • Camilo A. Molina

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina60020281
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 60, no. 2
p. 281

Abstract

Read online

Background and Objectives: Augmented reality head-mounted display (AR-HMD) is a novel technology that provides surgeons with a real-time CT-guided 3-dimensional recapitulation of a patient’s spinal anatomy. In this case series, we explore the use of AR-HMD alongside more traditional robotic assistance in surgical spine trauma cases to determine their effect on operative costs and perioperative outcomes. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively reviewed trauma patients who underwent pedicle screw placement surgery guided by AR-HMD or robotic-assisted platforms at an academic tertiary care center between 1 January 2021 and 31 December 2022. Outcome distributions were compared using the Mann–Whitney U test. Results: The AR cohort (n = 9) had a mean age of 66 years, BMI of 29.4 kg/m2, Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) of 4.1, and Surgical Invasiveness Index (SII) of 8.8. In total, 77 pedicle screws were placed in this cohort. Intra-operatively, there was a mean blood loss of 378 mL, 0.78 units transfused, 398 min spent in the operating room, and a 20-day LOS. The robotic cohort (n = 13) had a mean age of 56 years, BMI of 27.1 kg/m2, CCI of 3.8, and SII of 14.2. In total, 128 pedicle screws were placed in this cohort. Intra-operatively, there was a mean blood loss of 432 mL, 0.46 units transfused units used, 331 min spent in the operating room, and a 10.4-day LOS. No significant difference was found between the two cohorts in any outcome metrics. Conclusions: Although the need to address urgent spinal conditions poses a significant challenge to the implementation of innovative technologies in spine surgery, this study represents an initial effort to show that AR-HMD can yield comparable outcomes to traditional robotic surgical techniques. Moreover, it highlights the potential for AR-HMD to be readily integrated into Level 1 trauma centers without requiring extensive modifications or adjustments.

Keywords