Wellcome Open Research (Dec 2021)

Household overcrowding and risk of SARS-CoV-2: analysis of the Virus Watch prospective community cohort study in England and Wales [version 1; peer review: 1 approved, 2 approved with reservations]

  • Vincent Nguyen,
  • Max T Eyre,
  • Robert W Aldridge,
  • Anna Aryee,
  • Parth Patel,
  • Wing Lam Erica Fong,
  • Colette Smith,
  • Sarah Beale,
  • Anne M. Johnson,
  • Nicholas Patni,
  • Helen Pineo,
  • Jonathon Taylor,
  • Isobel Braithwaite,
  • Srinivasa Vittal Katikireddi,
  • Cyril Geismar,
  • Ellen Fragaszy,
  • Madhumita Shrotri,
  • Thomas Byrne,
  • Delan Devakumar,
  • Annalan M.D. Navaratnam,
  • Jana Kovar,
  • Andrew Hayward

Journal volume & issue
Vol. 6

Abstract

Read online

Background: Household overcrowding is associated with increased risk of infectious diseases across contexts and countries. Limited data exist linking household overcrowding and risk of COVID-19. We used data collected from the Virus Watch cohort to examine the association between overcrowded households and SARS-CoV-2. Methods: The Virus Watch study is a household community cohort of acute respiratory infections in England and Wales. We calculated overcrowding using the measure of persons per room for each household. We considered two primary outcomes: PCR-confirmed positive SARS-CoV-2 antigen tests and laboratory-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 antibodies. We used mixed-effects logistic regression models that accounted for household structure to estimate the association between household overcrowding and SARS-CoV-2 infection. Results: 26,367 participants were included in our analyses. The proportion of participants with a positive SARS-CoV-2 PCR result was highest in the overcrowded group (9.0%; 99/1,100) and lowest in the under-occupied group (4.2%; 980/23,196). In a mixed-effects logistic regression model, we found strong evidence of an increased odds of a positive PCR SARS-CoV-2 antigen result (odds ratio 2.45; 95% CI:1.43–4.19; p-value=0.001) and increased odds of a positive SARS-CoV-2 antibody result in individuals living in overcrowded houses (3.32; 95% CI:1.54–7.15; p-value<0.001) compared with people living in under-occupied houses. Conclusion: Public health interventions to prevent and stop the spread of SARS-CoV-2 should consider the risk of infection for people living in overcrowded households and pay greater attention to reducing household transmission.

Keywords