BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders (Dec 2017)

Single versus double row suture anchor fixation for greater tuberosity fractures – a biomechanical study

  • Gernot Seppel,
  • Tim Saier,
  • Frank Martetschläger,
  • Johannes E. Plath,
  • Alberto Guevara-Alvarez,
  • Julia Henschel,
  • Martin Winkler,
  • Peter Augat,
  • Andreas B. Imhoff,
  • Stefan Buchmann

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-017-1868-7
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 18, no. 1
pp. 1 – 7

Abstract

Read online

Abstract Background Fractures of the humeral greater tuberosity (GT) are a frequent injury progressively treated with arthroscopic suture anchor repair. Yet, no biomechanical study has been performed comparing fixation strength of arthroscopic single- (SR) vs. double row (DR) fixation. Methods Standardized fractures of the greater tuberosity were created in 12 fresh frozen proximal humeri. After random assignation to the SR or DR group the fixed humeri were tested applying cyclic loading to the supraspinatus and infraspinatus tendon. Load to failure and fragment displacement were assessed by means of an electrodynamic material testing machine using an optical tracking system. Results Load to failure values were higher in the DR group (649 N; ±176) than in the SR group (490 N; ±145) however without statistical significance (p = .12). In greater tuberosity displacement of 3–5 mm surgical treatment is recommended. The fixing constructs in this study did not reach displacement landmarks of 3 or 5 mm before construct failure as shown in previous studies. Thus the applied traction force (N) at 1 mm displacement was analyzed. In the SR group the load at 1 mm displacement was 277 N; ±46 compared to 260 N; ±62 in the DR group (p = .65). Conclusion The results suggest that both techniques are viable options for refixation of greater tuberosity fractures. Level of Evidence: Laboratory study.

Keywords