Foot & Ankle Orthopaedics (Oct 2019)
A 10-year Retrospective Case-Series of Venous Thrombo-Embolism frequency in Patients Treated with Total Contact Casts
Abstract
Category: Diabetes Introduction/Purpose: Venous Thrombo-Embolism (VTE) is a recognized complication of lower limb immobilization. In the neuropathic patient total contact casting (TCC) is used in the management of acute charcot neuroathropathy and/or to off-load neuropathic ulcers. To our knowledge, there is currently no literature stating the prevalence of VTE in patients, despite the possibility of prolonged lower limb immobilization. There are also no recommendations regarding VTE prophylaxis in the setting of TCCs. We report a retrospective case series assessing the frequency of symptomatic VTE in the patients treated with TCCs. Given that diabetic foot disease manifests as one of many co-morbidities in this medically complex group of patients we hypothesize that the rate of occurrence of VTE should be higher than that of the general population. Methods: Patients undergoing TCC between 2006 and 2018 were identified using plaster room records. These patients subsequently had electronic clinical letters and radiological reports assessed for details around the TCC episode, past medical history and any VTE events. Results: There were 143 TCC episodes in 105 patients. Average age at cast application was 55 years. The mean time in a cast was 45 days (range from 5 days to 8 months). 3 out of 4 patients had neuropathy as a consequence of diabetes. One TCC related VTE (0.7% of casting episodes) was documented. This was a proximal DVT confirmed on USS 9 days following cast removal. Only 3 patients received VTE prophylaxis while in TCC. Conclusion: Despite these complex patients having a multitude of co-morbidities the frequency of VTE in the TCC setting remains similar to that of the general population. This may be due to the fact that TCCs permit weight bearing or that Charcot arthropathy leads to a high outflow state, potentially turning Virchow’s triad in the patient’s favour. This case series suggests that, while all patients should be individually VTE risk assessed as for any lower limb immobilization, chemical thromboprophylaxis is not routinely indicated in the context of TCCs.