Pathogens (Apr 2021)

Minimally Invasive Autopsy Practice in COVID-19 Cases: Biosafety and Findings

  • Natalia Rakislova,
  • Lorena Marimon,
  • Mamudo R. Ismail,
  • Carla Carrilho,
  • Fabiola Fernandes,
  • Melania Ferrando,
  • Paola Castillo,
  • Maria Teresa Rodrigo-Calvo,
  • José Guerrero,
  • Estrella Ortiz,
  • Abel Muñoz-Beatove,
  • Miguel J. Martinez,
  • Juan Carlos Hurtado,
  • Mireia Navarro,
  • Quique Bassat,
  • Maria Maixenchs,
  • Vima Delgado,
  • Edwin Wallong,
  • Anna Aceituno,
  • Jean Kim,
  • Christina Paganelli,
  • Norman J. Goco,
  • Iban Aldecoa,
  • Antonio Martinez-Pozo,
  • Daniel Martinez,
  • José Ramírez-Ruz,
  • Gieri Cathomas,
  • Myriam Haab,
  • Clara Menéndez,
  • Jaume Ordi

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens10040412
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 10, no. 4
p. 412

Abstract

Read online

Postmortem studies are crucial for providing insight into emergent diseases. However, a complete autopsy is frequently not feasible in highly transmissible diseases due to biohazard challenges. Minimally invasive autopsy (MIA) is a needle-based approach aimed at collecting samples of key organs without opening the body, which may be a valid alternative in these cases. We aimed to: (a) provide biosafety guidelines for conducting MIAs in COVID-19 cases, (b) compare the performance of MIA versus complete autopsy, and (c) evaluate the safety of the procedure. Between October and December 2020, MIAs were conducted in six deceased patients with PCR-confirmed COVID-19, in a basic autopsy room, with reinforced personal protective equipment. Samples from the lungs and key organs were successfully obtained in all cases. A complete autopsy was performed on the same body immediately after the MIA. The diagnoses of the MIA matched those of the complete autopsy. In four patients, COVID-19 was the main cause of death, being responsible for the different stages of diffuse alveolar damage. No COVID-19 infection was detected in the personnel performing the MIAs or complete autopsies. In conclusion, MIA might be a feasible, adequate and safe alternative for cause of death investigation in COVID-19 cases.

Keywords