Comparison of Different EGFR Gene Mutation Status in Patients with Metastatic Non-Small Lung Cancer After First-Line EGFR-TKIs Therapy and Analyzing Its Relationship with Efficacy and Prognosis

Abstract

Chengliang Yuan, Huiqin Jiang, Wei Jiang, Huilin Wang, Cuiyun Su, Shaozhang Zhou Department of Respiratory Oncology, Guangxi Medical University Affiliated Tumor Hospital, Nanning City, Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, 530021, People’s Republic of ChinaCorrespondence: Shaozhang Zhou; Cuiyun SuDepartment of Respiratory Oncology, Guangxi Medical University Affiliated Tumor Hospital, No. 71 Heti Road, Nanning City, Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, 530021, People’s Republic of ChinaTel [phone]; [phone]Fax [phone]Email [email protected]; [email protected]: The purpose of this study is to compare the different EGFR mutation status in patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) after first-line EGFR-TKIs therapy and analyze its relationship with efficacy and prognosis.Patients and Methods: This study retrospectively analyzed the data of patients with metastatic NSCLC harboring EGFR mutation in the Affiliated Tumor Hospital of Guangxi Medical University from June 2016 to December 2020. Samples were collected before treatment and at the time of disease progression after first-line EGFR-TKIs therapy. Amplification refractory mutation system (ARMS) PCR and next-generation sequencing (NGS) were used to detect EGFR mutation. ORR, DCR, and PFS of different EGFR mutation groups were compared.Results: The EGFR mutation rate of re-biopsy was 60.23%. The inconsistency rate of EGFR mutations in the same and different simple types was 72.22% (26/36) and 92.31% (48/52), respectively. Alterations in terms of EGFR mutations were divided into four groups: Group A: EGFR-sensitive mutation negative and T790M negative (39.77%); Group B: EGFR-sensitive mutation positive and T790M negative (18.19%); Group C: EGFR-sensitive mutation negative and T790M positive (36.36%); Group D: EGFR-sensitive mutation positive and T790M positive (5.68%). The differences between the four groups in ORR and DCR were not statistically significant (P> 0.05). The median PFS of all patients was 10.65 months. PFS of Group A, B, C, and D was 12.26, 7.96, 10.55, and 13.81 months, respectively, with statistical significance (Log rank P = 0.014).Conclusion: EGFR mutation status in metastatic NSCLC patients receiving the first- and second-generation TKIs after disease progression show diversity. Monitoring the EGFR mutation changes is of great importance for subsequent clinical decision-making and exploring the underlying mechanisms of acquired resistance.Keywords: non-small cell lung cancer, EGFR-TKIs, re-biopsy, EGFR gene mutation status

Keywords

• non-small cell lung cancer
• egfr-tkis
• re-biopsy
• egfr gene mutation status