Accuracy of adult height predictions in patients with axial leg deviations using the Modified and the Abbreviated Modified Fels Knee System.

Abstract

BackgroundThe accurate estimation of residual growth is crucial for the appropriate timing of growth-guiding surgery in patients with axial leg deviations. Skeletal age methods such as the Modified and the Abbreviated Modified Fels Knee System were developed on historical patient cohorts and the applicability to the modern pediatric population with axial leg deviation has not yet been evaluated.Questions/purposesAre both final adult height prediction methods (the Modified Fels Knee System (FKS) and the Abbreviated Modified Fels Knee System (aFKS)) accurate to determine SA and the final adult height on long leg radiographs in patients with axial leg deviations?Which multiplier table shows highest association between predicted and true final adult body height?Do FKS- and aFKS- skeletal age determination methods improve final adult body height prediction accuracy compared to the simple use of chronological age?MethodsA single center, retrospective study of 31 patients who underwent temporary hemiepiphysiodesis due to axial leg deviations in the frontal plane between 2018 and 2020 was conducted. Skeletal age at the time of surgery was determined on an anterior-posterior long leg X-ray using FKS and aFKS. Adult height predictions were calculated using three different multiplier tables (Paley et al., Sanders-Greulich and Pyle (SGP), Sanders-Peak Height Velocity (PHV)). The accuracy of adult height prediction was determined by comparing the mean differences and mean absolute differences between predicted and true adult height.ResultsAll adult height predictions overestimated the true adult height. The final height prediction using aFKS and the SGP multiplier showed the lowest overestimation (mean 3.2 cm, SD 5.5 cm). The PHV multiplier table showed the highest correlation between predicted and true adult height (FHPRE_FKS_PHV: r = 0.913, p ConclusionsOverall, the results of the present retrospective cohort study show that there was no significant improvement in final height prediction accuracy when using the FKS or the aFKS method compared to the simple use of chronological age. One reason could be that patients with varus/valgus malalignment have specific growth characteristics that are not accounted for in multiplier tables or the FKS and aFKS method. Since there is no significant difference in prediction accuracy between the methods, the choice of method may depend on other factors, such as clinical preference or availability of resources. However, due to the small sample size, the study cannot definitively rule out potential differences between the prediction methods, and larger studies are required to validate these findings.