Effects of Character Strength-Based Intervention vs Group Counseling on Post-Traumatic Growth, Well-Being, and Depression Among University Students During the COVID-19 Pandemic in Guangdong, China: A Non-Inferiority Trial

Abstract

Yulan Yu,1,2 Rassamee Chotipanvithayakul,2,3 Wit Wichaidit,2 Wei Cai1 1Department of Psychology/ Research Center for Quality of Life and Applied Psychology, Guangdong Medical University, Dongguan, People’s Republic of China; 2Department of Epidemiology, Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla University, Hat Yai, Thailand; 3Research Center for Child and Youth Development, Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla University, Hat Yai, ThailandCorrespondence: Rassamee Chotipanvithayakul, Department of Epidemiology, Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla University, Hat Yai, Thailand, Tel [phone], Email [email protected] Wei Cai, Department of Psychology/Research Center for Quality of Life and Applied Psychology, Guangdong Medical University, Dongguan, People’s Republic of China, Tel [phone], Email [email protected]: This study assessed the effects of character strengths-based invention (CSI) vs group counseling (GC) on mental health outcomes (ie, post-traumatic growth, well-being, and depression) among university students in Guangdong Province, China.Materials and Methods: We conducted a randomized non-inferiority trial among 124 undergraduates at a medical university during the COVID-19 pandemic. We randomly allocated students to receive either CSI (n=62) or GC (n=62). A qualified psychologist delivered both activities on campus during two consecutive weekends with a total of 7.5 hours and also gave assignments to students during weekdays. We measured the outcomes at pre-intervention, post-intervention, and 1-month follow-up. We then analyzed data using descriptive statistics and a general linear mixed model.Results: CSI and GC groups had similar baseline characteristics. Both CSI and GC experienced an increase in post-traumatic growth and well-being. The mean±SD scores for post-traumatic growth were significantly higher in CSI compared to GC groups (87.70± 14.22 vs 78.15± 20.72, respectively), whereas well-being scores were similar between CSI and GC (82.58± 16.57 vs 83.68± 15.59, respectively). Neither CSI nor GC experienced a reduction in depression scores.Conclusion: CSI had non-inferior effects compared to GC with regards to improvement of post-traumatic growth and well-being during the COVID-19 pandemic. However, caveats regarding lack of blinding of investigator and limited generalizability should be considered in the interpretation of the study findings.Keywords: character strength-based intervention, post-traumatic growth, well-being, depression, university student

Keywords

• character strength-based intervention
• post-traumatic growth
• well-being
• depression
• university student