Cancer Medicine (May 2025)
Effects of the Number of Neoadjuvant Cycles and Addition of Adjuvant Chemotherapy on the Prognosis of Muscle‐Invasive Bladder Cancer Treated With Radical Cystectomy
- Shingo Hatakeyama,
- Rikiya Taoka,
- Jun Miki,
- Ryoichi Saito,
- Wataru Fukuokaya,
- Yoshiyuki Matsui,
- Takashi Kawahara,
- Ayumu Matsuda,
- Taketo Kawai,
- Minoru Kato,
- Tomokazu Sazuka,
- Takeshi Sano,
- Fumihiko Urabe,
- Soki Kashima,
- Hirohito Naito,
- Yoji Murakami,
- Makito Miyake,
- Kei Daizumoto,
- Yuto Matsushita,
- Takuji Hayashi,
- Junichi Inokuchi,
- Yusuke Sugino,
- Ken‐ichiro Shiga,
- Noriya Yamaguchi,
- Motohiro Taguchi,
- Keiji Yasue,
- Takashige Abe,
- Shotaro Nakanishi,
- Katsuyoshi Hashine,
- Masato Fujii,
- Kiyoaki Nishihara,
- Hiroaki Matsumoto,
- Shuichi Tatarano,
- Koichiro Wada,
- Sho Sekito,
- Ryo Maruyama,
- Naotaka Nishiyama,
- Hiroyuki Nishiyama,
- Hiroshi Kitamura,
- Chikara Ohyama,
- the Japanese Urological Oncology Group
Affiliations
- Shingo Hatakeyama
- Department of Urology Hirosaki University Graduate School of Medicine Aomori Japan
- Rikiya Taoka
- Department of Urology, Faculty of Medicine Kagawa University Kagawa Japan
- Jun Miki
- Department of Urology Jikei University Kashiwa Hospital Chiba Japan
- Ryoichi Saito
- Department of Urology and Andrology Kansai Medical University Osaka Japan
- Wataru Fukuokaya
- Department of Urology Jikei University Kashiwa Hospital Chiba Japan
- Yoshiyuki Matsui
- Department of Urology National Cancer Center Hospital Tokyo Japan
- Takashi Kawahara
- Department of Urology, Faculty of Medicine University of Tsukuba Tsukuba Japan
- Ayumu Matsuda
- Department of Urology National Cancer Center Hospital Tokyo Japan
- Taketo Kawai
- Department of Urology Graduate School of Medicine, the University of Tokyo Tokyo Japan
- Minoru Kato
- Department of Urology Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka Metropolitan University Osaka Japan
- Tomokazu Sazuka
- Department of Urology Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University Chiba Japan
- Takeshi Sano
- Department of Urology Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine Kyoto Japan
- Fumihiko Urabe
- Department of Urology The Jikei University School of Medicine Tokyo Japan
- Soki Kashima
- Department of Urology Akita University Graduate School of Medicine Akita Japan
- Hirohito Naito
- Department of Urology Kurashiki Central Hospital Okayama Japan
- Yoji Murakami
- Department of Urology Graduate School of Life Science, Kumamoto University Kumamoto Japan
- Makito Miyake
- Department of Urology Nara Medical University Nara Japan
- Kei Daizumoto
- Department of Urology Tokushima University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences Tokushima Japan
- Yuto Matsushita
- Department of Urology Hamamatsu University School of Medicine Shizuoka Japan
- Takuji Hayashi
- Department of Urology Osaka International Cancer Institute Osaka Japan
- Junichi Inokuchi
- Department of Urology Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University Fukuoka Japan
- Yusuke Sugino
- Department of Nephro‐Urologic Surgery and Andrology Mie University Graduate School of Medicine Mie Japan
- Ken‐ichiro Shiga
- Department of Urology Harasanshin General Hospital Fukuoka Japan
- Noriya Yamaguchi
- Department of Urology Tottori University Faculty of Medicine Tottori Japan
- Motohiro Taguchi
- Department of Urology Hyogo Medical University Hyogo Japan
- Keiji Yasue
- Department of Urology Jikei University Katsushika Medical Center Tokyo Japan
- Takashige Abe
- Department of Renal and Genitourinary Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine Hokkaido University Sapporo Hokkaido Japan
- Shotaro Nakanishi
- Department of Urology, Graduate School of Medicine University of the Ryukyus Okinawa Japan
- Katsuyoshi Hashine
- Department of Urology NHO Shikoku Cancer Center Matsuyama Ehime Japan
- Masato Fujii
- Department of Urology Faculty of Medicine, University of Miyazaki Miyazaki Japan
- Kiyoaki Nishihara
- Department of Urology Kurume University School of Medicine Fukuoka Japan
- Hiroaki Matsumoto
- Department of Urology Graduate School of Medicine Yamaguchi University Yamaguchi Japan
- Shuichi Tatarano
- Department of Urology, Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences Kagoshima University Kagoshima Japan
- Koichiro Wada
- Department of Urology Shimane University Faculty of Medicine Matsue Japan
- Sho Sekito
- Department of Urology Aichi Cancer Center Hospital Nagoya Japan
- Ryo Maruyama
- Department of Urology Niigata University Graduate School of Medicine Niigata Japan
- Naotaka Nishiyama
- Department of Urology, Faculty of Medicine University of Toyama Toyama Japan
- Hiroyuki Nishiyama
- Department of Urology, Faculty of Medicine University of Tsukuba Tsukuba Japan
- Hiroshi Kitamura
- Department of Urology, Faculty of Medicine University of Toyama Toyama Japan
- Chikara Ohyama
- Department of Urology Hirosaki University Graduate School of Medicine Aomori Japan
- the Japanese Urological Oncology Group
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1002/cam4.70782
- Journal volume & issue
-
Vol. 14,
no. 9
pp. n/a – n/a
Abstract
ABSTRACT Objective To evaluate the effects of the number of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) cycles and the addition of adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) after NAC on overall survival (OS) of patients with muscle‐invasive bladder cancer (MIBC). Patients and Methods We retrospectively evaluated 1687 patients with cT2‐4NxM0 MIBC who received radical cystectomy (RC) alone or RC plus perioperative chemotherapy at 36 institutions within the Japanese Urological Oncology Group. We evaluated the effect of the number of NAC cycles (2 vs. ≥ 3 cycles) and the addition of AC on OS. Results Among the 1687 patients analyzed, 946 received a median of three NAC cycles. The pathologic complete response rate did not significantly differ between those who received 2 (22.9%) and ≥ 3 cycles (27.5%, p = 0.112). Moreover, no significant difference in OS was observed between the groups (p = 0.559). Multivariable Cox regression analysis showed that pathologic high‐risk (ypT2–4, pT3–4, or pN+) or cisplatin ineligibility were significantly associated with poor OS but not the number of NAC cycles (p = 0.238). We identified 942 pathologically high‐risk patients after RC who were eligible for AC. Notably, no significant OS improvement was observed with the addition of AC as intensive perioperative chemotherapy after NAC. The primary limitation was selection bias from confounding by clinical indication. Conclusions Our findings showed that three or more NAC cycles and the addition of AC may have limited effects on OS in MIBC patients who received RC.
Keywords