Current Oncology (Mar 2022)

Concordance between Preoperative mpMRI and Pathological Stage and Its Influence on Nerve-Sparing Surgery in Patients with High-Risk Prostate Cancer

  • Clara Humke,
  • Benedikt Hoeh,
  • Felix Preisser,
  • Mike Wenzel,
  • Maria N. Welte,
  • Lena Theissen,
  • Boris Bodelle,
  • Jens Koellermann,
  • Thomas Steuber,
  • Alexander Haese,
  • Frederik Roos,
  • Luis Alex Kluth,
  • Andreas Becker,
  • Felix K. H. Chun,
  • Philipp Mandel

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/curroncol29040193
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 29, no. 4
pp. 2385 – 2394

Abstract

Read online

Background: We aimed to determine the concordance between the radiologic stage (rT), using multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI), and pathologic stage (pT) in patients with high-risk prostate cancer and its influence on nerve-sparing surgery compared to the use of the intraoperative frozen section technique (IFST). Methods: The concordance between rT and pT and the rates of nerve-sparing surgery and positive surgical margin were assessed for patients with high-risk prostate cancer who underwent radical prostatectomy. Results: The concordance between the rT and pT stages was shown in 66.4% (n = 77) of patients with clinical high-risk prostate cancer. The detection of patients with extraprostatic disease (≥pT3) by preoperative mpMRI showed a sensitivity, negative predictive value and accuracy of 65.1%, 51.7% and 67.5%. In addition to the suspicion of extraprostatic disease in mpMRI (≥rT3), 84.5% (n = 56) of patients with ≥rT3 underwent primary nerve-sparing surgery with IFST, resulting in 94.7% (n = 54) of men with at least unilateral nerve-sparing surgery after secondary resection with a positive surgical margin rate related to an IFST of 1.8% (n = 1). Conclusion: Patients with rT3 should not be immediately excluded from nerve-sparing surgery, as by using IFST some of these patients can safely undergo nerve-sparing surgery.

Keywords