Frontiers in Oncology (Apr 2022)

Automatic Prostate Gleason Grading Using Pyramid Semantic Parsing Network in Digital Histopathology

  • Yali Qiu,
  • Yujin Hu,
  • Peiyao Kong,
  • Hai Xie,
  • Xiaoliu Zhang,
  • Jiuwen Cao,
  • Tianfu Wang,
  • Baiying Lei

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2022.772403
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 12

Abstract

Read online

PurposeProstate biopsy histopathology and immunohistochemistry are important in the differential diagnosis of the disease and can be used to assess the degree of prostate cancer differentiation. Today, prostate biopsy is increasing the demand for experienced uropathologists, which puts a lot of pressure on pathologists. In addition, the grades of different observations had an indicating effect on the treatment of the patients with cancer, but the grades were highly changeable, and excessive treatment and insufficient treatment often occurred. To alleviate these problems, an artificial intelligence system with clinically acceptable prostate cancer detection and Gleason grade accuracy was developed.MethodsDeep learning algorithms have been proved to outperform other algorithms in the analysis of large data and show great potential with respect to the analysis of pathological sections. Inspired by the classical semantic segmentation network, we propose a pyramid semantic parsing network (PSPNet) for automatic prostate Gleason grading. To boost the segmentation performance, we get an auxiliary prediction output, which is mainly the optimization of auxiliary objective function in the process of network training. The network not only includes effective global prior representations but also achieves good results in tissue micro-array (TMA) image segmentation.ResultsOur method is validated using 321 biopsies from the Vancouver Prostate Centre and ranks the first on the MICCAI 2019 prostate segmentation and classification benchmark and the Vancouver Prostate Centre data. To prove the reliability of the proposed method, we also conduct an experiment to test the consistency with the diagnosis of pathologists. It demonstrates that the well-designed method in our study can achieve good results. The experiment also focused on the distinction between high-risk cancer (Gleason pattern 4, 5) and low-risk cancer (Gleason pattern 3). Our proposed method also achieves the best performance with respect to various evaluation metrics for distinguishing benign from malignant.AvailabilityThe Python source code of the proposed method is publicly available at https://github.com/hubutui/Gleason. All implementation details are presented in this paper.ConclusionThese works prove that the Gleason grading results obtained from our method are effective and accurate.

Keywords