Rheumatology and Therapy (Jun 2024)

New Insights on the Therapeutic Potential of Runt-Related Transcription Factor 2 for Osteoarthritis: Evidence from Mendelian Randomization

  • Jiale Xie,
  • Xin Xu,
  • Mingyi Yang,
  • Hui Yu,
  • Jinrong Hao,
  • Dinglong Yang,
  • Peng Xu

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40744-024-00682-1
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 11, no. 4
pp. 1001 – 1009

Abstract

Read online

Abstract Introduction Research has highlighted the role of runt-related transcription factor 2 (Runx2) in the development of osteoarthritis (OA); however, its causal association remains unclear. This study aimed to explore whether Runx2 expression is causally associated with OA and assess its therapeutic potential for OA. Methods Genetic proxy instruments for Runx2 expression were obtained from gene expression quantitative trait locus (eQTLs) study of eQTLGen Consortium (n = 31,684). Aggregated genome-wide association study (GWAS) data for OA (including all OA [177,517 cases and 649,173 controls], knee OA (KOA) [62,497 cases and 333,557 controls], and hip OA (HOA) [36,445 cases and 316,943 controls]) were extracted from the Genetics of Osteoarthritis Consortium. We integrated eQTLs data with OA GWAS data to estimate their causal association and to estimate the potential of Runx2 as a drug target in the treatment of OA using summary data-based Mendelian randomization (SMR) analysis. Furthermore, different OA GWAS data (including all OA [77,052 cases and 378,169 controls], KOA [24,955 cases and 378,169 controls], and HOA [15,704 cases and 378,169 controls]) derived from the GWAS Catalog database were used for replication study. Results SMR analysis showed that high expression levels of Runx2 were associated with an increased risk of all OA [odds ratio (OR) 1.044, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.023–1.067; P = 5.03 × 10−5], KOA (OR 1.040, 95% CI 1.006–1.075; P = 0.021), and HOA (OR 1.067, 95% CI 1.022–1.113; P = 0.003). This suggests that Runx2 inhibitors may have promising potential for the treatment of OA. Notably, the causal effects of Runx2 with all OA (OR 1.053, 95% CI 1.027–1.079; P = 3.95 × 10−5) and KOA (OR 1.043, 95% CI 1.001–1.087; P = 0.045) were repeated in the replication study, but limited evidence supported the association of Runx2 expression levels with HOA (OR 1.045, 95% CI 0.993–1.101; P = 0.094). Conclusions Our analyses indicate a positive correlation between Runx2 expression and OA risk across all three phenotypes, suggesting the potential of Runx2 inhibitors in the treatment of OA and providing evidence from a genetic perspective.

Keywords