A comparison between hospital follow‐up and collaborative follow‐up in patients with acute heart failure

Abstract

Abstract Aims There are no previous studies focusing on collaborative follow‐ups between hospitals and clinics for patients discharged after acute heart failure (AHF) in Japan. The purpose of this study was to determine the status of collaboration between hospitals and clinics for patients with AHF in Japan and to compare patient characteristics and clinical outcomes using a large Japanese observational database. Methods and results Of 4056 consecutive patients hospitalized for AHF in the Kyoto Congestive Heart Failure registry, we analysed 2862 patients discharged to go home, who were divided into 1674 patients (58.5%) followed up at hospitals with index hospitalization (hospital follow‐up group) and 1188 (41.5%) followed up in a collaborative fashion with clinics or other general hospitals (collaborative follow‐up group). The primary outcome was a composite of all‐cause death or heart failure (HF) hospitalization within 1 year after discharge. Previous hospitalization for HF and length of hospital stay longer than 15 days were associated with hospital follow‐up. Conversely, ≥80 years of age, hypertension, and cognitive dysfunction were associated with collaborative follow‐up. The cumulative 1‐year incidence of the primary outcome, all cause death, and cardiovascular death were similar between the hospital and collaborative follow‐up groups (31.6% vs. 29.6%, P = 0.51, 13.1% vs, 13.9%, P = 0.35, 8.4% vs. 8.2%, P = 0.96). Even after adjusting for confounders, the difference in risk for patients in the hospital follow‐up group relative to those in the collaborative follow‐up group remained insignificant for the primary outcome, all‐cause death, and cardiovascular death (HR: 1.11, 95% CI: 0.97–1.27, P = 0.14, HR: 1.10, 95% CI: 0.91–1.33, P = 0.33, HR: 0.96, 95% CI: 0.87–1.05, P = 0.33). The cumulative 1‐year incidence of HF hospitalization was higher in the hospital follow‐up group than in the collaborative follow‐up group (25.5% vs. 21.3%, P = 0.02). The risk of HF hospitalization was higher in the hospital follow‐up group than in the collaborative follow‐up group (HR: 1.19, 95% CI: 1.01–1.39, P = 0.04). Conclusions In patients hospitalized for AHF, 41.5% received collaborative follow‐up after discharge. The risk of HF hospitalization was higher in the hospital follow‐up group than in the collaborative follow‐up, although risk of the primary outcome, all‐cause death, and cardiovascular death were similar between groups.

Keywords

• Post discharge follow‐up
• Heart failure
• Collaborative follow‐up
• Transitional care
• Clinical outcome