BJPsych Open (Jan 2021)

Risk of adverse outcome of COVID-19 among patients in secure psychiatric services: observational cohort study

  • Natasa Basrak,
  • Naoise Mulcrone,
  • Sue Sharifuddin,
  • Zeshan Ghumman,
  • Nirvana Bechan,
  • Enas Mohamed,
  • Michael Murray,
  • Hariharan Rajendran,
  • Sean Gunnigle,
  • Mark Nolan,
  • Tim Quane,
  • Masashi Terao,
  • Tracey Hoare,
  • Kevin Kirrane,
  • Harry G. Kennedy,
  • Mary Davoren

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1192/bjo.2020.169
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 7

Abstract

Read online

Background Secure forensic mental health services treat patients with high rates of treatment-resistant psychoses. High rates of obesity and medical comorbidities are common. Population-based studies have identified high-risk groups in the event of SARS-CoV-2 infection, including those with problems such as obesity, lung disease and immune-compromising conditions. Structured assessment tools exist to ascertain the risk of adverse outcome in the event of SARS-CoV-2 infection. Aims To assess risk of adverse outcome in the event of SARS-CoV-2 infection in a complete population of forensic psychiatry patients using structured assessment tools. Method All patients of a national forensic mental health service (n = 141) were rated for risk of adverse outcome in the event of SARS-CoV-2 infection, using two structured tools, the COVID-Age tool and the COVID-Risk tool. Results We found high rates of relevant physical comorbidities. Mean chronological age was 45.5 years (s.d. = 11.4, median 44.1), mean score on the COVID-Age tool was 59.1 years (s.d. = 19.4, median 58.0), mean difference was 13.6 years (s.d. = 15.6), paired t = 10.9, d.f. = 140, P < 0.001. Three patients (2.1%) were chronologically over 70 years of age, compared with 43 (30.5%) with a COVID-Age over 70 (χ2 = 6.99, d.f. = 1, P = 0.008, Fisher's exact test P = 0.027). Conclusions Patients in secure forensic psychiatric services represent a high-risk group for adverse outcomes in the event of SARS-COV-2 infection. Population-based guidance on self-isolation and other precautions based on chronological age may not be sufficient. There is an urgent need for better physical health research and treatment in this group.

Keywords