Études Ricoeuriennes / Ricoeur Studies (Mar 2021)

Être, temps, et récit. Ricœur après et contre Heidegger

  • Samuel Lelièvre

DOI
https://doi.org/10.5195/errs.2020.520
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 11, no. 2
pp. 28 – 52

Abstract

Read online

The article draws a parallel between Ricœur’s critique of Heidegger’s conception of temporality and the demand for a more general critique of Heidegger’s philosophy. If Ricœur denied a proximity between Being and Time and Time and Narrative, he placed himself within a philosophical vein that addresses Heidegger’s first philosophy. But our knowledge of Heidegger’s Complete Works (Gesamtausgabe), including the “Black Notebooks,” requires integrating criticism of links between Heidegger and national-socialist ideology. In addition to various critical contents within Time and Narrative and developments related to the social sciences, the explicit reference to scientific concepts of time must also be highlighted. Ricœur breaks with Heidegger’s philosophy of time as inseparable from Ricœur’s reformulation of the issue of being and attempts to determine a conception of time engaging an ontological and epistemological critique of Being and Time.

Keywords