Journal of Interventional Medicine (Sep 2020)

Prostate artery embolization for the treatment of urinary retention caused by large (>80 ​mL) benign prostatic hyperplasia: Results of 21 patients

  • Bing Yuan,
  • Yan Wang,
  • MaoQiang Wang,
  • Jinlong Zhang,
  • Jieyu Yan,
  • Kai Yuan,
  • Jinxin Fu,
  • Xiuqi Wang

Journal volume & issue
Vol. 3, no. 3
pp. 142 – 145

Abstract

Read online

Objective: A large prostate size (>80 ​mL) of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) is technically challenging to treat surgically. This study aimed to investigate the safety and efficacy of super-selective prostatic artery embolization (PAE) for the treatment of urinary retention caused by large BPH. Methods: A total of 21 patients with urinary retention, indwelling urinary catheter, or suprapubic cystostomy as a consequence of giant BPH (prostate volume [PV] ​> ​80 ​mL) who sought treatment between January 2013 and December 2017 were enrolled. A microcatheter (1.9–2.7 Fr) and a “two-step embolization” combining 50-μm and 100-μm polyvinyl alcohol embolization particles were used in all patients. International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), quality of life (QoL), PV, and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) were evaluated at 3, 6, and 12 months post-PAE. Clinical success was defined as removal of urinary catheter or suprapubic cystostomy and ability to void spontaneously. Results: The clinical success rate was 95.2% (20/21). Compared with pre-procedural values, IPSS, QoL, PV, and PSA showed statistically significant differences at 3, 6, and 12 months post-PAE (P ​< ​0.05). There were no serious complications after PAE. Conclusions: PAE was safe and effective for the treatment of urinary retention caused by large BPH in patients without surgical treatment options.

Keywords