A Comparative Study of the Necessity of Qur'anic Interpretation from Hadith and the Companion View of Qur'an and Hadith in Interpretation

Abstract

One of the most fundamental issues related to the interpretation of the Qur'an is the study of the role of traditions in the interpretation. Commentators have adopted different views on the method of interpretation of the Qur'an regarding the extent to which the traditions have been used. In the unnecessary view of the Qur'anic interpretation of the hadiths, although it is permissible to use the traditions contrary to the Quranic perspective, it is not necessary; But in the view of accompanying the Qur'an and hadith in the interpretation, it is necessary to use the traditions And, contrary to the tradition of hadith, it is necessary to utilize all authentic sources such as the Qur'an, hadith and reason to obtain a correct interpretation of the Qur'an. In this article a comparative and analytical approach, using verses and narratives, is proved that The Qur'an and Hadith Companion View in Interpretation prefers the Qur'anic interpretation of hadiths and is more consistent with the verses and traditions, Because, according to some verses and traditions, the interpretation and interpretation of the Qur'an has been entrusted to the infallibles, and the use of authentic narrations is essential to arrive at a correct interpretation of the Qur'an.

Keywords

• quran independence
• method of interpretation
• role of traditions
• utilizing traditions
• narrative interpretation