Frontiers in Neurology (Apr 2017)
Effect of Cyclosporine on Lesion Growth and Infarct Size within the White and Gray Matter
- Tae-Hee Cho,
- Tae-Hee Cho,
- Tae-Hee Cho,
- Tae-Hee Cho,
- Tae-Hee Cho,
- Elodie Ong,
- Elodie Ong,
- Elodie Ong,
- Elodie Ong,
- Elodie Ong,
- Nathan Mewton,
- Nathan Mewton,
- Nathan Mewton,
- Julien Bouvier,
- Julien Bouvier,
- Julien Bouvier,
- Julien Bouvier,
- Julien Bouvier,
- Fabien Chauveau,
- Fabien Chauveau,
- Fabien Chauveau,
- Thomas Ritzenthaler,
- Thomas Ritzenthaler,
- Thomas Ritzenthaler,
- Thomas Ritzenthaler,
- Thomas Ritzenthaler,
- Laura Mechtouff,
- Laura Mechtouff,
- Laura Mechtouff,
- Laura Mechtouff,
- Laura Mechtouff,
- Laurent Derex,
- Laurent Derex,
- Laurent Derex,
- Laurent Derex,
- Laurent Derex,
- Marielle Buisson,
- Marielle Buisson,
- Marielle Buisson,
- Yves Berthezène,
- Yves Berthezène,
- Yves Berthezène,
- Yves Berthezène,
- Yves Berthezène,
- Michel Ovize,
- Michel Ovize,
- Michel Ovize,
- Norbert Nighoghossian,
- Norbert Nighoghossian,
- Norbert Nighoghossian,
- Norbert Nighoghossian,
- Norbert Nighoghossian
Affiliations
- Tae-Hee Cho
- Department of Stroke Medicine, Université Lyon 1, Lyon, France
- Tae-Hee Cho
- Department of Neuroradiology, Université Lyon 1, Lyon, France
- Tae-Hee Cho
- CREATIS, CNRS-UMR5220 INSERM-U1044, Lyon, France
- Tae-Hee Cho
- INSA-Lyon, Lyon, France
- Tae-Hee Cho
- Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France
- Elodie Ong
- Department of Stroke Medicine, Université Lyon 1, Lyon, France
- Elodie Ong
- Department of Neuroradiology, Université Lyon 1, Lyon, France
- Elodie Ong
- CREATIS, CNRS-UMR5220 INSERM-U1044, Lyon, France
- Elodie Ong
- INSA-Lyon, Lyon, France
- Elodie Ong
- Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France
- Nathan Mewton
- Department of Cardiology, Clinical Investigation Center, Université Lyon 1, Lyon, France
- Nathan Mewton
- CarMeN, CNRS-UMR1060, Lyon, France
- Nathan Mewton
- Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France
- Julien Bouvier
- Department of Stroke Medicine, Université Lyon 1, Lyon, France
- Julien Bouvier
- Department of Neuroradiology, Université Lyon 1, Lyon, France
- Julien Bouvier
- CREATIS, CNRS-UMR5220 INSERM-U1044, Lyon, France
- Julien Bouvier
- INSA-Lyon, Lyon, France
- Julien Bouvier
- Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France
- Fabien Chauveau
- Lyon Neuroscience Research Center, Université Lyon 1, Lyon, France
- Fabien Chauveau
- 0CNRS-UMR5292, Lyon, France
- Fabien Chauveau
- 1INSERM-U1028, Lyon, France
- Thomas Ritzenthaler
- Department of Stroke Medicine, Université Lyon 1, Lyon, France
- Thomas Ritzenthaler
- Department of Neuroradiology, Université Lyon 1, Lyon, France
- Thomas Ritzenthaler
- CREATIS, CNRS-UMR5220 INSERM-U1044, Lyon, France
- Thomas Ritzenthaler
- INSA-Lyon, Lyon, France
- Thomas Ritzenthaler
- Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France
- Laura Mechtouff
- Department of Stroke Medicine, Université Lyon 1, Lyon, France
- Laura Mechtouff
- Department of Neuroradiology, Université Lyon 1, Lyon, France
- Laura Mechtouff
- CREATIS, CNRS-UMR5220 INSERM-U1044, Lyon, France
- Laura Mechtouff
- INSA-Lyon, Lyon, France
- Laura Mechtouff
- Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France
- Laurent Derex
- Department of Stroke Medicine, Université Lyon 1, Lyon, France
- Laurent Derex
- Department of Neuroradiology, Université Lyon 1, Lyon, France
- Laurent Derex
- CREATIS, CNRS-UMR5220 INSERM-U1044, Lyon, France
- Laurent Derex
- INSA-Lyon, Lyon, France
- Laurent Derex
- Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France
- Marielle Buisson
- Department of Cardiology, Clinical Investigation Center, Université Lyon 1, Lyon, France
- Marielle Buisson
- CarMeN, CNRS-UMR1060, Lyon, France
- Marielle Buisson
- Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France
- Yves Berthezène
- Department of Stroke Medicine, Université Lyon 1, Lyon, France
- Yves Berthezène
- Department of Neuroradiology, Université Lyon 1, Lyon, France
- Yves Berthezène
- CREATIS, CNRS-UMR5220 INSERM-U1044, Lyon, France
- Yves Berthezène
- INSA-Lyon, Lyon, France
- Yves Berthezène
- Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France
- Michel Ovize
- Department of Cardiology, Clinical Investigation Center, Université Lyon 1, Lyon, France
- Michel Ovize
- CarMeN, CNRS-UMR1060, Lyon, France
- Michel Ovize
- Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France
- Norbert Nighoghossian
- Department of Stroke Medicine, Université Lyon 1, Lyon, France
- Norbert Nighoghossian
- Department of Neuroradiology, Université Lyon 1, Lyon, France
- Norbert Nighoghossian
- CREATIS, CNRS-UMR5220 INSERM-U1044, Lyon, France
- Norbert Nighoghossian
- INSA-Lyon, Lyon, France
- Norbert Nighoghossian
- Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2017.00151
- Journal volume & issue
-
Vol. 8
Abstract
BackgroundIn a recent trial, cyclosporine A (CsA) failed to reduce infarct size in acute stroke patients treated with intravenous thrombolysis. White matter (WM) and gray matter (GM) may have distinct vulnerability to ischemia and response to therapy. Using final infarct size and lesion growth as endpoints, our objectives were to (1) investigate any tissue-specific effect of CsA and (2) compare WM and GM response to thrombolysis.Materials and methodsWe analyzed 84 patients from the randomized and placebo-controlled CsA-Stroke trial, who underwent MRI both on admission and at 1 month. Lesion growth was defined voxel-wise as infarcted tissue at 1 month with no visible lesion on baseline diffusion-weighted imaging. After automatic segmentation of GM/WM, final infarct size and lesion growth were compared within the GM and WM.ResultsOcclusion level was distal (>M1) in 51% of cases. No significant difference in GM/WM proportions was observed within final infarcts between treatment groups (P = 0.21). Infarct size within the GM or WM was similar between the CsA and control groups [GM: 9.2 (2.4; 22.8) with CsA vs 8.9 (3.7; 28.4) mL with placebo, P = 0.74; WM: 9.9 (4.7; 25.4) with CsA vs 14.1 (5.6; 34.1) mL with placebo, P = 0.26]. There was no significant effect of CsA on lesion growth in either the GM or WM. Pooling all patients, a trend for increased relative lesion growth in WM compared to GM was observed [49.0% (14.7; 185.7) vs 43.1% (15.4; 117.1), respectively; P = 0.12].ConclusionNo differential effect of CsA was observed between WM and GM. Pooling all patients, a trend toward greater lesion growth in WM was observed.
Keywords