Smart Cities (Aug 2024)

Impact of Privacy Filters and Fleet Changes on Connected Vehicle Trajectory Datasets for Intersection and Freeway Use Cases

  • Enrique D. Saldivar-Carranza,
  • Rahul Suryakant Sakhare,
  • Jairaj Desai,
  • Jijo K. Mathew,
  • Ashmitha Jaysi Sivakumar,
  • Justin Mukai,
  • Darcy M. Bullock

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/smartcities7050093
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 7, no. 5
pp. 2366 – 2391

Abstract

Read online

Commercially available crowdsourced connected vehicle (CV) trajectory data have recently been used to provide stakeholders with actionable and scalable roadway mobility infrastructure performance measures. Transportation agencies and automotive original equipment manufacturers (OEMs) share a common vision of ensuring the privacy of motorists that anonymously provide their journey information. As this market has evolved, the fleet mix has changed, and some OEMs have introduced additional fuzzification of CV data around 0.5 miles of frequently visited locations. This study compared the estimated Indiana market penetration rates (MPRs) between historic non-fuzzified CV datasets from 2020 to 2023 and a 5–11 May 2024, CV dataset with fuzzified records and a reduced fleet. At selected permanent interstate and non-interstate count stations, overall CV MPRs decreased by 0.5% and 0.3% compared to 2023, respectively. However, the trend in previous years was upward. Additionally, this paper evaluated the impact on data characteristics at freeways and intersections between the 5–11 May 2024, fuzzified CV dataset and a non-fuzzified 7–13 May 2023, CV dataset. The analysis found that the total number of GPS samples decreased 10% statewide. Of the evaluated 54,284 0.1-mile Indiana freeway, US Route, and State Route segments, the number of CV samples increased for 33.8% and decreased for 65.9%. This study also evaluated 26,291 movements at 3289 intersections and found that the number of available trajectories increased for 28.3% and decreased for 70.4%. This paper concludes that data representativeness is enough to derive most relevant mobility performance measures. However, since the change in available trajectories is not uniformly distributed among intersection movements, an unintended sample bias may be introduced when computing performance measures. This may affect signal retiming or capital investment opportunity identification algorithms.

Keywords