Frontiers in Medicine (Feb 2022)

Medical Students' and Trainees' Country-By-Gender Profiles: Hofstede's Cultural Dimensions Across Sixteen Diverse Countries

  • Lynn V. Monrouxe,
  • Lynn V. Monrouxe,
  • Madawa Chandratilake,
  • Julie Chen,
  • Shakuntala Chhabra,
  • Lingbing Zheng,
  • Patrício S. Costa,
  • Patrício S. Costa,
  • Patrício S. Costa,
  • Young-Mee Lee,
  • Orit Karnieli-Miller,
  • Hiroshi Nishigori,
  • Kathryn Ogden,
  • Teresa Pawlikowska,
  • Arnoldo Riquelme,
  • Ahsan Sethi,
  • Diantha Soemantri,
  • Diantha Soemantri,
  • Andy Wearn,
  • Liz Wolvaardt,
  • Muhamad Saiful Bahri Yusoff,
  • Sze-Yuen Yau

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2021.746288
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 8

Abstract

Read online

PurposeThe global mobility of medical student and trainee populations has drawn researchers' attention to consider internationalization in medical education. Recently, researchers have focused on cultural diversity, predominately drawing on Hofstede's cross-cultural analysis of cultural dimensions from general population data to explain their findings. However, to date no research has been specifically undertaken to examine cultural dimensions within a medical student or trainee population. This is problematic as within-country differences between gender and professional groups have been identified within these dimensions. We address this gap by drawing on the theoretical concept of national context effects: specifically Hofstede's six-dimensional perspective. In doing so we examine medical students' and trainees' country profiles across dimensions, country-by-gender clustering, and differences between our data and Hofstede's general population data.MethodsWe undertook a cross-cultural online questionnaire study (eight languages) containing Hofstede's 2013 Values Survey. Our questionnaire was live between 1st March to 19th Aug 2018, and December 2018 to mitigate country holiday periods. We recruited undergraduate medical students and trainees with at least 6-months' clinical training using school-specific methods including emails, announcements, and snowballing.ResultsWe received 2,529 responses. Sixteen countries were retained for analyses (n = 2,307, 91%): Australia, Chile, China, Hong Kong, India, Indonesia, Ireland, Israel, Japan, Malaysia, New Zealand, Pakistan, South Africa, South Korea, Sri-Lanka, Taiwan. Power distance and masculinity are homogenous across countries. Uncertainty avoidance shows the greatest diversity. We identified four country clusters. Masculinity and uncertainty are uncorrelated with Hofstede's general population data.ConclusionsOur medical student and trainee data provides medical education researchers with more appropriate cultural dimension profiles than those from general population data. Country cluster profiles stimulate useful hypotheses for further research, especially as patterning between clusters cuts across traditional Eastern-Western divides with national culture being stronger than gendered influences. The Uncertainty dimension with its complex pattern across clusters is a particularly fruitful avenue for further investigation.

Keywords