Quality of life after anterior vaginal wall suspension for incontinence and prolapse repair with mixed, urge, or stress urinary incontinence

Abstract

Purpose:: To compare qualify of life outcomes in women with mixed urinary incontinence (MUI), urge (UUI) or stress (SUI) urinary incontinence after treatment with an anterior vaginal wall suspension (AVWS) to correct urethral hypermobility and concomitant anterior compartment prolapse (ACP). Methods:: Following IRB approval, a prospective long-term database of women who underwent an AVWS for urinary incontinence (UI) with early stage (stage ≤2) ACP was reviewed. Patients completed the Urogenital Distress Inventory short form (UDI-6 SF) and a one question visual analog scale (VAS) of quality of life (QoL) before and after AVWS. Indication for AVWS was based on demonstrable UI, with documented urethral hypermobility and cystocele on standing lateral cystogram comparing rest and straining views. Three groups (MUI, SUI, and UUI) were analyzed based on urge (Question 2) and stress (Question 3) predominant scores at baseline. Results:: From 1997 to 2018, 104 patients met study criteria: 54 with MUI, 30 SUI predominant, and 20 UUI predominant. Total UDI-6 and QoL scores improved significantly from baseline to 1-year post-AVWS and to the last visit (median 3.5 years) in all three groups. Patients with MUI had the most improvement based on UDI-6 total and QoL scores. Conclusions:: Regardless of the nature of baseline UI symptoms, restoring support of the anterior vaginal wall compartment can durably improve UI-specific quality of life scores in the short and long-term.

Keywords

• Anterior vaginal wall suspension
• Mixed urinary incontinence
• Stress urinary incontinence
• Urge urinary incontinence
• Anterior compartment prolapse