Percutaneous cystostomy drainage for early removing urethral catheter in robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: Improving on patients' discomfort

Abstract

Objective: Urethral catheterization is often a major source of discomfort and pain to a patient after a surgical procedure. To better understand the safety and feasibility of the early removal of urethral Foley catheter after robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy by using percutaneous cystostomy drainage, we collected the related data and present our experience. Patients and methods: This study involved 20 patients. In the study group (10 patients), we used the percutaneous cystostomy device (PCD) and an 18 French urethral catheter together. The urethral catheter was removed at postoperative day (POD) 3 and the PCD was removed at POD 7. In the control group (10 patients), they had standard urethral catheterization with an 18 French catheter and the catheter was removed at POD 7. Demographic and outcome data were measured and analyzed. Urethral pain was recorded using the visual analog scale. Results: The two groups were comparable in terms of age, serum prostate specific antigen level, body mass index, clinical tumor stage, surgical duration, estimated blood loss, and surgical times. The study group had significantly less penile pain in POD 3 and POD 7 (mean visual analog scale: 0.9 vs. 2.2, p < 0.001 at POD 3; 0.1 vs. 1.4, p = 0.002 at POD 7). All patients had good urinary continence within 30 days and no urethra stricture was found during the follow up period. Conclusion: The use of a percutaneous cystostomy device is feasible and safe for the early removal of urethral Foley catheter in robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy to decrease penile pain and patient discomfort.

Keywords

• early removal of urethral catheter
• percutaneous cystostomy
• robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy