HBM4EU Chromates Study—Genotoxicity and Oxidative Stress Biomarkers in Workers Exposed to Hexavalent Chromium
Ana Tavares,
Kukka Aimonen,
Sophie Ndaw,
Aleksandra Fučić,
Julia Catalán,
Radu Corneliu Duca,
Lode Godderis,
Bruno C. Gomes,
Beata Janasik,
Carina Ladeira,
Henriqueta Louro,
Sónia Namorado,
An Van Nieuwenhuyse,
Hannu Norppa,
Paul T. J. Scheepers,
Célia Ventura,
Jelle Verdonck,
Susana Viegas,
Wojciech Wasowicz,
Tiina Santonen,
Maria João Silva,
on behalf of the HBM4EU Chromates Study Team
Affiliations
Ana Tavares
Department of Human Genetics, National Institute of Health Dr. Ricardo Jorge (INSA), Av. Padre Cruz, 1649-016 Lisbon, Portugal
Kukka Aimonen
Finnish Institute of Occupational Health, 00250 Helsinki, Finland
Sophie Ndaw
French National Research and Safety Institute, 54500 Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, France
Aleksandra Fučić
Institute for Medical Research and Occupational Health, Ksaverska Cesta 2, HR-10001 Zagreb, Croatia
Julia Catalán
Finnish Institute of Occupational Health, 00250 Helsinki, Finland
Radu Corneliu Duca
Centre for Environment and Health, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, KU Leuven (University of Leuven), O&N 5b, Herestraat 49, P.O. Box 952, 3000 Leuven, Belgium
Lode Godderis
Centre for Environment and Health, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, KU Leuven (University of Leuven), O&N 5b, Herestraat 49, P.O. Box 952, 3000 Leuven, Belgium
Bruno C. Gomes
Centre for Toxicogenomics and Human Health (Toxomics), NOVA Medical School, Universidade NOVA de Lisboa, Campo dos Mártires da Pátria, 130, 1169-056 Lisbon, Portugal
Beata Janasik
Department of Environmental and Biological Monitoring, Nofer Institute of Occupational Medicine, 91348 Lodz, Poland
Carina Ladeira
HTRC—Health & Technology Research Center, ESTeSL—Escola Superior de Tecnologia da Saúde, Instituto Politécnico de Lisboa, 1549-020 Lisbon, Portugal
Henriqueta Louro
Department of Human Genetics, National Institute of Health Dr. Ricardo Jorge (INSA), Av. Padre Cruz, 1649-016 Lisbon, Portugal
Sónia Namorado
Department of Human Genetics, National Institute of Health Dr. Ricardo Jorge (INSA), Av. Padre Cruz, 1649-016 Lisbon, Portugal
An Van Nieuwenhuyse
Centre for Environment and Health, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, KU Leuven (University of Leuven), O&N 5b, Herestraat 49, P.O. Box 952, 3000 Leuven, Belgium
Hannu Norppa
Finnish Institute of Occupational Health, 00250 Helsinki, Finland
Paul T. J. Scheepers
Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboudumc, 6500 HB Nijmegen, The Netherlands
Célia Ventura
Department of Human Genetics, National Institute of Health Dr. Ricardo Jorge (INSA), Av. Padre Cruz, 1649-016 Lisbon, Portugal
Jelle Verdonck
Centre for Environment and Health, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, KU Leuven (University of Leuven), O&N 5b, Herestraat 49, P.O. Box 952, 3000 Leuven, Belgium
Susana Viegas
NOVA National School of Public Health, Universidade NOVA de Lisboa, 1600-560 Lisbon, Portugal
Wojciech Wasowicz
Department of Environmental and Biological Monitoring, Nofer Institute of Occupational Medicine, 91348 Lodz, Poland
Tiina Santonen
Finnish Institute of Occupational Health, 00250 Helsinki, Finland
Maria João Silva
Department of Human Genetics, National Institute of Health Dr. Ricardo Jorge (INSA), Av. Padre Cruz, 1649-016 Lisbon, Portugal
A study was conducted within the European Human Biomonitoring Initiative (HBM4EU) to characterize occupational exposure to Cr(VI). Herein we present the results of biomarkers of genotoxicity and oxidative stress, including micronucleus analysis in lymphocytes and reticulocytes, the comet assay in whole blood, and malondialdehyde and 8-oxo-2′-deoxyguanosine in urine. Workers from several Cr(VI)-related industrial activities and controls from industrial (within company) and non-industrial (outwith company) environments were included. The significantly increased genotoxicity (p = 0.03 for MN in lymphocytes and reticulocytes; p p = 0.007 and p < 0.001 for MDA and 8-OHdG levels in pre-shift urine samples, respectively) that were detected in the exposed workers over the outwith company controls suggest that Cr(VI) exposure might still represent a health risk, particularly, for chrome painters and electrolytic bath platers, despite the low Cr exposure. The within-company controls displayed DNA and chromosomal damage levels that were comparable to those of the exposed group, highlighting the relevance of considering all industry workers as potentially exposed. The use of effect biomarkers proved their capacity to detect the early biological effects from low Cr(VI) exposure, and to contribute to identifying subgroups that are at higher risk. Overall, this study reinforces the need for further re-evaluation of the occupational exposure limit and better application of protection measures. However, it also raised some additional questions and unexplained inconsistencies that need follow-up studies to be clarified.