Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience (Nov 2021)

Age-Related Differences in Resting-State EEG and Allocentric Spatial Working Memory Performance

  • Adeline Jabès,
  • Giuliana Klencklen,
  • Giuliana Klencklen,
  • Paolo Ruggeri,
  • Jean-Philippe Antonietti,
  • Pamela Banta Lavenex,
  • Pamela Banta Lavenex,
  • Pierre Lavenex

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fnagi.2021.704362
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 13

Abstract

Read online

During normal aging resting-state brain activity changes and working memory performance declines as compared to young adulthood. Interestingly, previous studies reported that different electroencephalographic (EEG) measures of resting-state brain activity may correlate with working memory performance at different ages. Here, we recorded resting-state EEG activity and tested allocentric spatial working memory in healthy young (20–30 years) and older (65–75 years) adults. We adapted standard EEG methods to record brain activity in mobile participants in a non-shielded environment, in both eyes closed and eyes open conditions. Our study revealed some age-group differences in resting-state brain activity that were consistent with previous results obtained in different recording conditions. We confirmed that age-group differences in resting-state EEG activity depend on the recording conditions and the specific parameters considered. Nevertheless, lower theta-band and alpha-band frequencies and absolute powers, and higher beta-band and gamma-band relative powers were overall observed in healthy older adults, as compared to healthy young adults. In addition, using principal component and regression analyses, we found that the first extracted EEG component, which represented mainly theta, alpha and beta powers, correlated with spatial working memory performance in older adults, but not in young adults. These findings are consistent with the theory that the neurobiological bases of working memory performance may differ between young and older adults. However, individual measures of resting-state EEG activity could not be used as reliable biomarkers to predict individual allocentric spatial working memory performance in young or older adults.

Keywords