Vaccines (Sep 2024)

Safety and Immunogenicity of the Intranasal Vaccine Candidate Mambisa and the Intramuscular Vaccine Abdala Used as Booster Doses for COVID-19 Convalescents: A Randomized Phase 1–2 Clinical Trial

  • Gilda Lemos-Pérez,
  • Yinet Barrese-Pérez,
  • Yahima Chacón-Quintero,
  • Rolando Uranga-Piña,
  • Yisel Avila-Albuerne,
  • Iglermis Figueroa-García,
  • Osaida Calderín-Marín,
  • Martha M. Gómez-Vázquez,
  • Marjoris Piñera-Martínez,
  • Sheila Chávez-Valdés,
  • Ricardo Martínez-Rosales,
  • Lismary Ávila-Díaz,
  • Amalia Vázquez-Arteaga,
  • Hany González-Formental,
  • Giselle Freyre-Corrales,
  • Edelgis Coizeau-Rodríguez,
  • Miladys Limonta-Fernández,
  • Marta Ayala-Avila,
  • Eduardo Martínez-Díaz,
  • Eulogio Pimentel-Vazquez,
  • Gerardo Guillen

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines12091001
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 12, no. 9
p. 1001

Abstract

Read online

A phase 1–2, prospective, multicenter, randomized, open-label clinical trial (Code RPCEC00000382), with parallel groups, involving 1161 participants, was designed to assess the safety and immunogenicity of two Cuban COVID-19 vaccines (Mambisa and Abdala) in boosting COVID-19 immunity of convalescent adults after receiving one dose of either vaccine. The main safety outcome was severe vaccination adverse events occurring in 55% of vaccinees in Phase 1 and >70% in Phase 2. Neutralizing antibody titers against SARS-CoV-2 variants were evaluated. Both vaccines were safe—no deaths or severe adverse events occurred. Mild intensity adverse events were the most frequent (>73%); headaches predominated for both vaccines. Phase 1 responders were 83.3% (p = 0.0018) for Abdala. Mambisa showed similar results. Phase 2 responders were 88.6% for Abdala (p p = 0.0412). In both phases, anti-RBD IgG titers, inhibition percentages and neutralizing antibody titers increased significantly after the booster dose. Both vaccines were safe and their immunogenicity surpassed the study endpoints.

Keywords