Pulmonary Therapy (Jul 2024)

The Impact of Autoantibodies on Outcomes in Patients with Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis: Post-Hoc Analyses of the Phase III ASCEND Trial

  • Tejaswini Kulkarni,
  • Chad A. Newton,
  • Sachin Gupta,
  • Katerina Samara,
  • Elana J. Bernstein

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s41030-024-00267-x
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 10, no. 3
pp. 331 – 346

Abstract

Read online

Abstract Introduction Clinical practice guidelines recommend autoimmune serological testing in patients newly diagnosed with interstitial lung disease of apparently unknown cause who may have idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF), in order to exclude connective tissue disease (CTD). Autoantibody positivity has been associated with unique patient profiles and prognosis in patients with IPF who otherwise lack a CTD diagnosis. Methods This post-hoc analysis of patients with IPF from the Phase III ASCEND trial (NCT01366209) evaluated the association of antinuclear antibodies (ANA), rheumatoid factor (RF) and anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide (anti-CCP) status with baseline disease characteristics, disease progression [percent predicted forced vital capacity (%FVC), forced vital capacity (FVC) volume and progression-free survival (PFS)], and treatment outcomes with pirfenidone and placebo (%FVC, FVC and PFS). Results Of 555 participants, 244/514 (47.5%) were ANA positive (ANA+), 83/514 (16.1%) had high ANA+ (ANA titre ≥ 1:160 or positive nucleolar- or centromere-staining patterns), 60/555 (10.8%) were RF positive (RF+) and/or anti-CCP positive (anti-CCP+) and 270/514 (52.5%) were autoantibody negative (AAb−). Baseline demographics and characteristics were generally comparable between autoantibody subgroups. Although not statistically significant, more placebo-treated participants with ANA+ or high ANA+ had a decline from baseline to Week 52 of ≥ 10% in %FVC or death (48.7% and 55.9%, respectively) or in FVC volume or death (48.7% and 47.1%, respectively) compared with the AAb− group (%FVC or death: 42.0%; FVC volume or death: 42.0%). The RF+ and/or anti-CCP+ group was similar to AAb−. No differences were observed in PFS. A treatment benefit for pirfenidone versus placebo was observed regardless of autoantibody status [PFS: ANA+ HR (95% CI): 0.56 (0.37 to 0.86), P = 0.007; AAb− HR (95% CI): 0.50 (0.32 to 0.78), P = 0.002]. Conclusion IPF disease course did not differ by autoantibody status in ASCEND. Pirfenidone had a treatment benefit regardless of the presence of ANA. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov identifier, NCT01366209.

Keywords