BMC Research Notes (Jul 2018)

A comparison of the Allplex™ bacterial and viral assays to conventional methods for detection of gastroenteritis agents

  • Kelly Amrud,
  • Robert Slinger,
  • Nadia Sant,
  • Marc Desjardins,
  • Baldwin Toye

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13104-018-3645-6
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 11, no. 1
pp. 1 – 4

Abstract

Read online

Abstract Objective Molecular methods to detect diarrheal pathogens are increasingly being used in place of conventional methods. We compared a new multiplex real-time PCR assay for detection of both bacterial and viral gastroenteritis agents, the Allplex™ Gastrointestinal Panel Assays (AGPA), to conventional methods (stool culture for bacterial pathogens and electron microscopy (EM) for viral pathogens). Results Gastrointestinal viruses, in particular norovirus genogroup II viruses, were detected by the AGPA in a high number of specimens that were negative by EM. For bacterial pathogens, the AGPA was able to detect the organisms grown in culture with high sensitivity and additionally detected several types of E. coli, such as enteropathogenic E. coli (EPEC), enteroaggregative E. coli (EAEC), and non-O157 Shiga toxin-producing E. coli (STEC), that could not be detected with conventional culture methods. Overall, the AGPA had a > 2-fold higher detection rate than the conventional methods, with 24/135 (17.8%) samples positive by conventional methods and 60/135 (44.4%) by AGPA. Thus, diarrhea pathogen detection rates increased substantially with the use of the AGPA as compared to conventional methods.

Keywords