PLoS ONE (Jan 2022)

Color diversity judgments in peripheral vision: Evidence against "cost-free" representations.

  • Brylee Hawkins,
  • Dee Evans,
  • Anya Preston,
  • Kendra Westmoreland,
  • Callie E Mims,
  • Kiara Lolo,
  • Nicholas Rosario,
  • Brian Odegaard

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0279686
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 17, no. 12
p. e0279686

Abstract

Read online

Is visual perception "rich" or "sparse?" One finding supporting the "rich" hypothesis shows that a specific visual summary representation, color diversity, is represented "cost-free" outside focally-attended regions in dual-task paradigms [1]. Here, we investigated whether this "cost-free" phenomenon for color diversity perception extends to peripheral vision. After replicating previous findings and verifying that color diversity is represented "cost-free" in central vision, we performed two experiments: in our first experiment, we extended the paradigm to peripheral vision and found that in minimally-attended regions of space, color diversity perception was impaired. In a second and final experiment, we added confidence judgments to our task, and found that participants maintained high levels of metacognitive awareness of impaired performance in minimally-attended visual areas in the periphery. These findings provide evidence that color perception may be partially attention-dependent in peripheral vision, and challenge previous views on both sides of the rich vs. sparse debate.