Journal of Investigative Surgery (Feb 2022)

Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Followed by Radical Surgery versus Concurrent Chemo-Radiotherapy in the Treatment of Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer: A Multicenter Retrospective Analysis

  • Paolo Sala,
  • Stefano Bogliolo,
  • Fabio Barra,
  • Alessandra Fazio,
  • Mattia Maramai,
  • Chiara Cassani,
  • Barbara Gardella,
  • Luciana Babilonti,
  • Flavio Giannelli,
  • Serafina Mammoliti,
  • Arsenio Spinillo,
  • Simone Ferrero,
  • Mario Valenzano Menada,
  • Sergio Costantini,
  • Paolo Bruzzi,
  • Pierangelo Marchiolè

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/08941939.2020.1856239
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 35, no. 2
pp. 308 – 314

Abstract

Read online

Objectives This study aims to evaluate oncological outcomes in women affected by locally advanced cervical cancer (LACC) treated by neoadjuvant chemotherapy before radical surgery (NACT + RS) or concurrent chemo-radiotherapy (CCRT). Methods This was a multicenter retrospective analysis of data related to women with LACC (FIGO stage IB2-IVA), who were treated by NACT + RS or CCRT between November 2006 and January 2018. The first endpoints were the evaluation of disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS); univariate and multivariate analyses were performed for identifying the prognostic factors independently associated with these oncological outcomes. Results Overall, 106 women were included in the analysis; 55 of them (51.9%) underwent NACT + RS and 51 (48.1%) CCRT, respectively. Patients in the NACT + RS group had a significant better five-year DFS and five-year OS than those in the CCRT group (77.4% vs. 33.4%, p < .001 and 93.8% vs. 56.5%, p = .003). In the multivariate analyses, treatment choice (NACT + RS or CCRT) was the only independent prognostic factor for predicting both DFS (HR = 3.954; 95 CI = 1.898–8.236; p < 0.001) and OS (HR = 5.330; 95 CI = 1.563–18.178; p = 0.008). Conclusions This retrospective study demonstrated an improved survival outcome for patients undergoing NACT + RS compared with those undergoing CCRT. Our findings seem to support the use of NACT before RS as an effective alternative option to CCRT standard therapy.

Keywords