Ecological Processes (Jun 2021)

Evaluation of the WEAP model in simulating subbasin hydrology in the Central Rift Valley basin, Ethiopia

  • Debele Abera Abdi,
  • Tenalem Ayenew

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13717-021-00305-5
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 10, no. 1
pp. 1 – 14

Abstract

Read online

Abstract Background The subbasin hydrologic behaviors have been altered by many natural and anthropologic factors such as climate change and land development activities. Model-based assessment can be used to simulate both natural hydrological processes, human-induced effects, and management strategies on water resources. For the Ketar subbasin, the WEAP (water evaluation and planning) hydrologic model was developed that aimed at (1) evaluating the application of the WEAP model in the Ketar subbasin, (2) evaluating the demonstration of the WEAP model using model efficiency evaluation criteria, and (3) simulating hydrological processes of the subbasin using the WEAP model. Methods WEAP-based soil moisture method (rainfall-runoff) hydrology routine is comprised of a lumped, one-dimensional, two-layer soil water accounting that uses empirical functions to designate evapotranspiration, surface runoff, interflow, and deep percolation for a sub-unit at root zone. A catchment is considered as the smallest hydrologic response unit. The catchment’s surface hydrological balance is typically estimated by discretizing the catchment into multiple land uses for which water balance is estimated at root zone. Results The monthly measured and simulated streamflow statistics showed a positive strong relationship with R 2 of 0.82, NSE of 0.80, and IA of 0.95; and with R 2 of 0.91, NSE of 0.91, and IA of 0.98 for calibration and validation periods respectively. Similarly, the mean monthly measured and simulated streamflow showed an agreement with R 2 of 0.99, NSE of 0.97, and IA of 0.99, and R 2 of 0.94, NSE of 0.93, and IA of 0.93 for the periods of calibration and validation respectively. Conclusion The model has demonstrated the capability to represent the hydrologic dynamics of the subbasin both at monthly and mean monthly periods. In general, the overall model performance evaluation statistics show a very good agreement between measured and simulated streamflow at the outlet of the subbasin.

Keywords