BMC Medical Research Methodology (Jul 2023)

Technologies for frailty, comorbidity, and multimorbidity in older adults: a systematic review of research designs

  • Alessia Gallucci,
  • Pietro D. Trimarchi,
  • Cosimo Tuena,
  • Silvia Cavedoni,
  • Elisa Pedroli,
  • Francesca Romana Greco,
  • Antonio Greco,
  • Carlo Abbate,
  • Fabrizia Lattanzio,
  • Marco Stramba-Badiale,
  • Fabrizio Giunco

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-023-01971-z
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 23, no. 1
pp. 1 – 15

Abstract

Read online

Abstract Background Frailty, neurodegeneration and geriatric syndromes cause a significant impact at the clinical, social, and economic level, mainly in the context of the aging world. Recently, Information and Communication Technologies (ICTs), virtual reality tools, and machine learning models have been increasingly applied to the care of older patients to improve diagnosis, prognosis, and interventions. However, so far, the methodological limitations of studies in this field have prevented to generalize data to real-word. This review systematically overviews the research designs used by studies applying technologies for the assessment and treatment of aging-related syndromes in older people. Methods Following the PRISMA guidelines, records from PubMed, EMBASE, and Web of Science were systematically screened to select original articles in which interventional or observational designs were used to study technologies’ applications in samples of frail, comorbid, or multimorbid patients. Results Thirty-four articles met the inclusion criteria. Most of the studies used diagnostic accuracy designs to test assessment procedures or retrospective cohort designs to build predictive models. A minority were randomized or non-randomized interventional studies. Quality evaluation revealed a high risk of bias for observational studies, while a low risk of bias for interventional studies. Conclusions The majority of the reviewed articles use an observational design mainly to study diagnostic procedures and suffer from a high risk of bias. The scarce presence of methodologically robust interventional studies may suggest that the field is in its infancy. Methodological considerations will be presented on how to standardize procedures and research quality in this field.

Keywords