Psychology Research and Behavior Management (Aug 2022)
Decision Reversibility and Satisfaction: The Mediating Role of Counterfactual Thinking and Anticipated Regret
Abstract
Xiao Li,1,2 Jing Ye,1 Mianlin Deng,1 Xudong Zhao,1 Wendian Shi1 1Department of Psychology, School of Education, Shanghai Normal University, Shanghai, People’s Republic of China; 2School of Society & Culture, Party School of Ningxia Committee of C.P.C, Yinchuan, People’s Republic of ChinaCorrespondence: Wendian Shi, Department of Psychology, School of Education, Shanghai Normal University, No. 100 Guilin Road, Xuhui District, Shanghai, 200234, People’s Republic of China, Tel +86 21 64323104, Email [email protected]: Extensive research has shown that reversible decisions yield lower post-decision satisfaction than irreversible decisions. However, to date, little is known about how decision reversibility affects post-decision satisfaction. Based on regret theory, this study aimed to examine the mediating role of counterfactual thinking and anticipated regret in the association between decision reversibility and satisfaction.Methods: In this study (130 participants), participants were randomly assigned to two personnel decision situations with reversible and irreversible decision outcomes, and all participants completed questionnaires during the process of completing the decision task. The questionnaires used included the Counterfactual Thinking for Negative Events Scale, Anticipated Regret Scale, and satisfaction questionnaire. Finally, the data were statistically analyzed using the base package in R and PROCESS 3.5.Results: The results show that (1) Compared to irreversible decisions, reversible decisions have a significant negative impact on satisfaction. (2) Counterfactual thinking plays a mediating role between decision reversibility and satisfaction. (3) Compared with irreversible decisions, reversible decisions further lowered the level of post-decision satisfaction through the chain mediating effects of counterfactual thinking and anticipated regret.Conclusion: People’s lowered levels of post-decision satisfaction in the reversible decision condition relate to increased levels of counterfactual thinking and anticipated regret. In addition, counterfactual thinking can play a mediating role alone, indicating that this variable may be critical in understanding the mechanisms by which decision reversibility affects satisfaction. This knowledge may be used to help people optimize their decision-making behavior.Keywords: decision reversibility, satisfaction, regret theory, counterfactual thinking, anticipated regret
