Clinical Epidemiology (Feb 2022)
Validation of Postsurgical Venous Thromboembolism Diagnoses of Patients Undergoing Lower Limb Orthopedic Surgery in the Danish National Patient Registry
Abstract
Josephine Galsklint,1 Søren Kold,2,3 Søren Risom Kristensen,1,2 Marianne Tang Severinsen,2,4 Inger Lise Gade2,4,5 1Department of Clinical Biochemistry, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark; 2Department of Clinical Medicine, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark; 3Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark; 4Department of Hematology and Clinical Cancer Research, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark; 5Department of Hematology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, DenmarkCorrespondence: Marianne Tang Severinsen, Department of Hematology, University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark, Email [email protected]: Healthcare databases can be a valuable source of epidemiological research regarding postoperative venous thromboembolism (VTE), ie, deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE), following orthopedic procedures, but only if the diagnoses are valid. We examined the validity of VTE diagnosis codes in the Danish National Patient Registry (DNPR) by calculating their positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) versus actual medical records.Methods: We identified patients who had undergone lower limb surgery during the period 2009– 2019 at a hospital in the North Denmark Region. Of these, 420 patients had at least one VTE diagnosis registered in the DNPR within 180 days after lower limb surgery. Each patient with a VTE diagnosis was matched with two patients on age and sex, as well as type, location and period of surgery. The entire medical record and diagnostic imaging were reviewed to confirm VTE diagnosis.Results: The overall PPVs was 85.2% (95% CI: 81.5– 88.5%) for first time VTE diagnosis following lower limb surgery, 82.6% (95% CI: 77.5– 82.8%) for DVT, and 90.3% (95% CI: 84.3– 94.6%) for PE. We found improvement in PPV during the study period when stratifying for three periods of the whole period. There were no significant differences when stratifying for sex, age, or surgery site. All negative predictive values were higher than 99%. A total of 113 additional VTE diagnoses were registered among 88 VTE patients during follow-up. Only four of the suspected recurrent VTEs were confirmed to be true recurrent VTEs.Conclusion: The VTE diagnosis codes in the DNPR after lower limb orthopedic surgery were highly valid against the actual medical records, and we observed better PPV over recent years.Keywords: epidemiology, venous thromboembolism, orthopedic procedures, positive predictive value, PPV, negative predictive value, NPV, validity
