BMJ Open (Jul 2022)

Barriers and facilitators to facility-based delivery in rural Zambia: a qualitative study of women’s perceptions after implementation of an improved maternity waiting homes intervention

  • Peter C Rockers,
  • Godfrey Biemba,
  • Davidson H Hamer,
  • Nancy A Scott,
  • Jeanette L Kaiser,
  • Taryn Vian,
  • Rachel M Fong,
  • Thandiwe Ngoma,
  • Jody R Lori,
  • Michelle Munro-Kramer,
  • Misheck Bwalya,
  • Gertrude Musonda,
  • Eden Ahmed Mdluli,
  • Viviane Rutagwera Sakanga,
  • Kayla J Kuhfeldt

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-058512
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 12, no. 7

Abstract

Read online

Objectives Women in sub-Saharan Africa face well-documented barriers to facility-based deliveries. An improved maternity waiting homes (MWH) model was implemented in rural Zambia to bring pregnant women closer to facilities for delivery. We qualitatively assessed whether MWHs changed perceived barriers to facility delivery among remote-living women.Design We administered in-depth interviews (IDIs) to a randomly selected subsample of women in intervention (n=78) and control (n=80) groups who participated in the primary quasi-experimental evaluation of an improved MWH model. The IDIs explored perceptions and preferences of delivery location. We conducted content analysis to understand perceived barriers and facilitators to facility delivery.Setting and participants Participants lived in villages 10+ km from the health facility and had delivered a baby in the previous 12 months.Intervention The improved MWH model was implemented at 20 rural health facilities.Results Over 96% of participants in the intervention arm and 90% in the control arm delivered their last baby at a health facility. Key barriers to facility delivery were distance and transportation, and costs associated with delivery. Facilitators included no user fees, penalties for home delivery, desire for safe delivery and availability of MWHs. Most themes were similar between study arms. Both discussed the role MWHs have in improving access to facility-based delivery. Intervention arm participants expressed that the improved MWH model encourages use and helps overcome the distance barrier. Control arm participants either expressed a desire for an improved MWH model or did not consider it in their decision making.Conclusions Even in areas with high facility-based delivery rates in rural Zambia, barriers to access persist. MWHs may be useful to address the distance challenge, but no single intervention is likely to address all barriers experienced by rural, low-resourced populations. MWHs should be considered in a broader systems approach to improving access in remote areas.Trial registration number NCT02620436.