Frontiers in Medicine (Jul 2022)

Network Meta-Analysis of Perioperative Analgesic Effects of Different Interventions on Postoperative Pain After Arthroscopic Shoulder Surgery Based on Randomized Controlled Trials

  • Wu Jiangping,
  • Wu Jiangping,
  • Quan Xiaolin,
  • Quan Xiaolin,
  • Shu Han,
  • Shu Han,
  • Xiaolan Zhou,
  • Nie Mao,
  • Nie Mao,
  • Deng Zhibo,
  • Deng Zhibo,
  • Gong Ting,
  • Gong Ting,
  • Hu Shidong,
  • Hu Shidong,
  • Li Xiangwei,
  • Li Xiangwei,
  • Yuan Xin,
  • Yuan Xin,
  • Shu Guoyin,
  • Shu Guoyin

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2022.921016
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 9

Abstract

Read online

BackgroundShoulder arthroscopic surgery is a common surgical method used in orthopedics. However, severe postoperative pain can significantly limit the early joint movement of patients and adversely affect the impact of the surgery. At present, there is no consistent and effective analgesic scheme for the management of postoperative pain after arthroscopic surgery of the shoulder.PurposeThe aim of this study was to search for the most effective analgesic scheme to control pain in the perioperative period of arthroscopic surgery of the shoulder.Study DesignNetwork meta-analysis.MethodsWe searched 5 different databases (i.e., Medline, PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library) from January 2011 to January 2021 for English literature. Thereafter, we sifted out randomized controlled trials (RCTs), which compared different intervention schemes for pain management after shoulder arthroscopy and selected only 12 h, 24 h, or 48 h after the patient leaves the operating room as an optimal period for administration of analgesic intervention schemes. Only patients with shoulder disease who have undergone arthroscopic shoulder surgery were included in this study. The Cochrane “risk of bias” was used for the quality assessment. Moreover, some additional tests were performed to enhance the credibility of the results.ResultsTwenty-nine RCTs involving 1,885 patients were included in this frequentist network meta-analysis (NMA). These articles mainly were divided into two distinct groups, namely, the nerve block group and the non-nerve block group. Regarding the nerve block group, at postoperative 12 h, the intervention suprascapular nerve block + interscalene nerve block (SSNB + INB) was ranked first, whereas INB + intra-articular injection (INB + IAI) was ranked first at 24 h and 48 h postoperation. In the non-nerve block group, external application (EA) was ranked first at postoperative 12 h, but oral administration (OA) exhibited a better analgesic effect at postoperative 24 h and postoperative 48 h.ConclusionWe conclude that the analgesic effect of SSNB+INB was the best at postoperative 12 h, and INB+IAI was the best at postoperative 24 h and 48 h in the nerve block group. For the non-nerve block group, the effect of EA was the best at postoperative 12 h, and the analgesic effect of OA at postoperative 24 h and 48 h was significantly better than any other interventions.Systematic Review Registrationhttps://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, identifier: CRD42021286777.

Keywords